Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: clinical systematic review
Chen S, Pi D, Ansari, M, Puil L, Desjardins B, Banks R
Record ID 32008000112
English, French
Authors' objectives:
"The objectives of the project were to determine the role of IVIg in the treatment of ITP by addressing the following research questions: 1) Does IVIg have an incremental benefit in treating ITP over alternative standard therapy? 2) What place does IVIg have in the management of acute or chronic ITP in children or adults? 3) Is there sufficient evidence to identify subgroups of ITP patients who may preferentially benefit from IVIg?" (executive summary)
Authors' recommendations:
This review examined the clinical effectiveness of using IVIg in the management of patients with ITP, compared with other active treatments or placebo.
For acute ITP in children, inconsistent results were reported across studies regarding IVIg superiority in the early recovery of profound thrombocytopenia. Our quantitative synthesis shows significant differences in the proportion of patients with platelet counts greater than or equal to 20Q109/L at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the start of treatment, in favour of IVIg compared with corticosteroids. In adult patients with profound thrombocytopenia, the effect of IVIg on clinical outcomes remains indeterminate. Sparse evidence indicates that IVIg may be more efficacious in improving platelet counts in the short term than corticosteroids but possibly at the risk of more SAEs.
Until further adequately powered and controlled trials are available, the clinical impact of choosing these agents versus available alternatives in most situations remains uncertain. For acute ITP in children, our findings showed that IVIg (0.8 g/kg/day to 1 g/kg/day over one to two days) is more efficacious than corticosteroids in terms of the early improvement of thrombocytopenia to platelet counts greater than or equal to 20Q109/L. The role of IVIg in chronic childhood ITP could not be established because evidence from scant, poorly designed, and poorly reported randomized controlled trials could not be synthesized. There are insufficient data to determine whether IVIg has an advantage over other interventions in the long-term management of adult ITP. Finally, there is insufficient evidence to identify subgroups of ITP patients who may preferentially benefit from IVIg.
Authors' methods:
Systematic review
Details
Project Status:
Completed
Year Published:
2008
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
Canada
MeSH Terms
- Immunoglobulins, Intravenous
Contact
Organisation Name:
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Contact Address:
600-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8 Canada. Tel: +1 613 226 2553; Fax: +1 613 226 5392;
Contact Name:
requests@cadth.ca
Contact Email:
requests@cadth.ca
Copyright:
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.