Screening for elevated blood lead levels in childhood and pregnancy: Update of a 1996 U.S. preventive services task force review
Rischitelli G, Nygren P, Bougatsos C, Freeman M, Helfand M
Record ID 32008000005
English
Authors' objectives:
In 1996, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) provided recommendations for routine screening of asymptomatic children and pregnant women for elevated blood lead levels. This review updates the evidence for the benefits and harms of screening and intervention for elevated blood lead in asymptomatic children and pregnant women.
Authors' results and conclusions:
The prevalence of elevated blood lead levels among children and women in the United States, like that in the general population, continues to decline sharply, due primarily to marked reductions in environmental exposure, but still varies substantially among different communities and populations.
Similar to the findings in 1996, our searches did not identify direct evidence from controlled studies that screening children for elevated blood lead levels results in improved health outcomes and there was no direct evidence identified from controlled studies that screening improves pregnancy or perinatal outcomes.
No new relevant information regarding the accuracy of screening for lead toxicity was identified during the update and we did not identify evidence that demonstrates that universal screening for blood lead results in better clinical outcomes than targeted screening. Substantial new relevant information regarding the adverse effects of screening and interventions was not identified.
Authors' recommendations:
There is no persuasive evidence that screening for elevated lead levels in asymptomatic children will improve clinical outcomes. For those children who are screened and found to have elevated levels, there is conflicting evidence demonstrating the clinical effectiveness of early detection and intervention.
Similarly, there are no controlled trials evaluating screening for elevated lead levels in pregnant women, nor are there sufficient data to construct an adequate chain of evidence demonstrating benefit.
Community-based interventions are likely to be more effective than office-based screening, treatment, and counseling.
Authors' methods:
Review
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf06/lead/leadsum.htm#contents
Year Published:
2007
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
United States
MeSH Terms
- Lead
- Mass Screening
Contact
Organisation Name:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Contact Address:
Center for Outcomes and Evidence Technology Assessment Program, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Tel: +1 301 427 1610; Fax: +1 301 427 1639;
Contact Name:
martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Contact Email:
martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Copyright:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.