Optical coherence tomography, for the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment effectiveness with aflibercept in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (co-dependent)

Medical Services Advisory Committee
Record ID 32007000859
English
Authors' recommendations: After considering the strength of the available evidence in relation to the safety, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for assessment of central retinal thickness in the presence of macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion for access to aflibercept, MSAC advises that it does not currently support public funding because of insufficiently presented evidence in relation to its roles in assessing oedema before using treatment and also in monitoring treatment and thus in relation to its cost-effectiveness. MSAC advised that existing data, appropriately analysed, would usefully inform a reconsideration. MSAC proposed that it would convene a stakeholder meeting in conjunction with PBAC to progress OCT-related applications, including by determining what data would help inform MSAC and PBAC. The stakeholder meeting should include ophthalmologists, consumers, OCT providers and the pharmaceutical companies who are lodging and planning applications for medicines to treat ocular diseases and which involve the use of OCT.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2013
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Australia
MeSH Terms
  • Macula Lutea
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Retinal Vein Occlusion
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors
  • Intravitreal Injections
Contact
Organisation Name: Medical Services Advisory Committee
Contact Address: MSAC (MDP 107), GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Tel: +61 2 6289 6811; Fax: +61 2 6289 8799.
Contact Name: msac.secretariat@health.gov.au
Contact Email: msac.secretariat@health.gov.au
Copyright: <p>Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC)</p>
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.