Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of infliximab and etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis

Suarez-Almazor ME, Ortiz Z, Lopez-Olivo M, Moffett M, Pak C, Skidmore B, Kimmel B, Kallen M, Cox V
Record ID 32007000137
English
Authors' objectives:

six research questions were addressed; . What is the evidence from clinical trials or observational studies of the long-term benefit and harm from Infliximab (IFX) and Etanercept (ETN) for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) compared to standard care? . What is the evidence of cost-effectiveness for IFX and ETN for RA compared to standard care? . What is the clinical impact of introducing IFX or ETN as initial therapy or after failure with other drug therapies? . What is the clinical impact of using higher doses at more frequent intervals (dose creep) versus no dose change? . What is the dose-related clinical impact of using IFX or ETN at various stages of disease? . Do patients who fail treatment with one anti-TNF agent respond to therapy with a different one?

Authors' recommendations: Implications for Decision Making : IFX and ETN are moderately effective at one year. The evidence suggests that IFX and ETN, when used concomitantly with methotrexate (MTX), improve surrogate and composite outcomes, such as delay in radiological progression and American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria. The longterm impact on functionality, survival, or quality of life has not been demonstrated. : IFX and ETN are not cost-saving. The economic evidence suggests that ETN and IFX, when used concomitantly with MTX, is only cost-effective for the treatment of RA after the failure of other DMARDs and if society is willing to pay more than $100,000 Canadian dollars to obtain a quality-adjusted life-year. : Timing therapy may improve response rates. Uncertainty remains about dose escalation and switching. The evidence suggests that surrogate responses to IFX or ETN combined with MTX, when compared to using MTX alone, are increased in patients with longer disease duration or in those who had failed previous treatment with MTX. There is insufficient evidence to support switching between agents and the practice of dose escalation.
Authors' methods: Overview, Cost study
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2007
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Canada
MeSH Terms
  • Antirheumatic Agents
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Contact
Organisation Name: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Contact Address: 600-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8 Canada. Tel: +1 613 226 2553; Fax: +1 613 226 5392;
Contact Name: requests@cadth.ca
Contact Email: requests@cadth.ca
Copyright: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.