[Operation for vaginal prolapse in day surgery - a health technology assessment]
Axelsen S, Sørensen J
Record ID 32006001433
Danish
Authors' recommendations:
Vaginal wall prolapse surgery is an obvious option for outpatient treatment. We used local anesthesia, but the same procedure may also be possible to undertake with spinal or general anesthesia.
The advantages in the reorganization are greatest in relation to the effects on the technology and costs, while the two treatment regimes are broadly similar seen from the patient's point of view. As operation for vaginal wall prolapse is one of the most common operations at gynecological departments substantial savings can be made.
Conversion to outpatient treatment affects big parts of the organization. Future changeover to outpatient treatment need to be succeeded by a thorough description of the existing organization, and a model for the new regime has to be chosen.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
Year Published:
2006
URL for published report:
http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2006/CEMTV/Vaginal_kirurgi/Vaginal_kir.pdf
URL for additional information:
http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2006/CEMTV/Vaginal_kirurgi/Vaginal_kir_en.pdf
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
Denmark
MeSH Terms
- Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
- Female
- Technology Assessment, Biomedical
- Vagina
- Uterine Prolapse
Contact
Organisation Name:
Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment
Contact Address:
National Board of Health, PO Box 1881, Islands Brygge 67, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. Tel: 45 72 22 74 48; Fax: 45 72 22 74 07/67
Contact Name:
dacehta@sst.dk
Contact Email:
dacehta@sst.dk
Copyright:
Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment (DACEHTA)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.