Screening and interventions for childhood overweight: evidence synthesis

Whitlock E P, Williams S B, Gold R, Smith P, Shipman S
Record ID 32006000042
English
Authors' objectives:

The focus of this evidence synthesis is to examine the evidence for the benefits and harms of screening and earlier treatment of overweight in children and adolescents in clinical settings.

Authors' results and conclusions: No trials of screening programs to identify and treat overweight in children and adolescents have been reported. Body mass index (BMI) (weight in kilograms [kg] divided by height in meters squared) is the preferred clinical measure for overweight. Although BMI is a measure of relative weight rather than of adiposity, it is widely recommended for use in children and adolescents to determine overweight, and correlates as well or better with measures of body fat in children and adolescents than other clinically feasible measures. Based on BMI criteria for overweight (BMI at or above the 95th percentile for age and sex), 10% of two- to five-year-olds and 16% of those six and older are overweight, with significantly higher prevalence in minority racial/ethnic and sex-specific subgroups beginning at age six. Age- and sex-specific BMI percentiles for use as references for U.S. children and adolescents (CDC 2000 growth charts) have been created from nationally representative datasets that primarily included black and non-Hispanic white children. The validity of BMI-based overweight categorization in racial/ethnic minorities with differences in body composition may be limited, since BMI measures can not differentiate between increased weight for height due to relatively greater fat-free mass (muscle, bone, fluids) and increased weight due to greater fat in either individuals or populations. BMI measures in childhood track to adulthood moderately or very well, with better tracking seen after age 12 to 13 (particularly when this age represents achieving sexual maturity), or in younger children (aged 6-12) with one or more obese parents or whose own BMI is above the 95th percentile. The risk of adult obesity in those with childhood overweight (BMI > 95th percentile) provides the best available evidence by which to judge the clinical validity of BMI as an overweight criterion in children and adolescents. The probability of adult obesity in overweight adolescents is highest for 16-18 year-old white males (0.77-0.8) and white females (0.66-0.68), with little data on other race-ethnic groups in this age group available. Limited research is available on effective, generalizable interventions for overweight children and adolescents that can be conducted in primary care or to which primary care can make referrals. Most research has investigated intensive behavioral counseling interventions conducted by specialists with repeated contacts over 6 to 12 months, many using family-based comprehensive behavioral treatments. The largest single body of research addresses children aged 8-12 years. No current research is reported in children aged two-five. The number of studies addressing adolescents is small, but increasing. Overall, current trials are limited due to small--often-selective--samples; non-comparable interventions between trials; short-term (6 to 24 months) follow-up; reporting of overweight outcomes only with minimal reporting of health outcomes; and failing to report intention-to-treat analyses. Harms of screening and labeling children as overweight or obese theoretically include induced self-managed dieting with its sequelae, poorer self-concept, poorer health habits, disordered eating, or negative impacts of parental concern. Harms are not well reported in behavioral intervention trials. Limited good-quality evidence is available on pharmacological approaches as an adjunct to comprehensive behavioral treatment in adolescents, and no reasonable-quality evidence is available on bariatric surgery outcomes in adolescents.
Authors' recommendations: BMI measurement to detect overweight in older adolescents could identify those at increased risk of developing adult obesity, and its consequent morbidities. Promising interventions to address overweight adolescents in clinical settings are beginning to be reported but are not yet proven to have clinically significant benefits; nor are they widely available. Screening for the purposes of overweight categorization in children under age 12 to 13 who are not clearly overweight may not provide reliable risk categorization for adult obesity. Theoretical harms may occur from overweight labeling or from induced individual and parental concern. Screening approaches are further compromised by the fact that there is little generalizable evidence for interventions that can be conducted in primary care or are widely available for primary care referral. Despite this, the fact that many trials report short- to medium-term modest improvements (approximately 10%-20% decrease in percent overweight or a few units' change in BMI) suggests that overweight improvements in children and adolescents are possible. Experts have identified pragmatic clinical recommendations for lifestyle changes that could be applied to all children and adolescents regardless of risk. While monitoring growth and development in children and adolescents through BMI documentation at visits is prudent, care should be taken not to unnecessarily label children and adolescents as overweight or at risk for overweight until more is known about BMI as a risk factor, and effective interventions are available.
Authors' methods: Review
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2005
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: United States
MeSH Terms
  • Body Mass Index
  • Child
  • Overweight
  • Obesity
Contact
Organisation Name: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Contact Address: Center for Outcomes and Evidence Technology Assessment Program, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Tel: +1 301 427 1610; Fax: +1 301 427 1639;
Contact Name: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Contact Email: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Copyright: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.