Screening mammography: a reassessment

Deck W, Kakuma R
Record ID 32005001134
English, French
Authors' objectives:

This update of two reports by the Conseil d'Evaluation des technologies de la sante (CETS) published in 1990 and 1993 addresses three questions: (1) What is the strength of the scientific evidence on which screening mammography programs are based? (2) What evidence is there in support of screening for women aged 40 to 49 years? (3) What are the implications of research studies for maximizing the effectiveness of modern programs such as the Programme quebecois de depistage du cancer du sein (PQDCS)?

Authors' recommendations: Existing scientific trials, despite their flaws, support mammography screening programs. In addition, there are good reasons to believe that modern, wellconducted screening programs may achieve earlier detection and diagnosis of breast cancer and, perhaps, greater reductions in breast cancer mortality than what has been found in screening trials. Trial data published to date do not provide scientific justification to recommend screening for women younger than 50. However, this conclusion does not exclude the possibility that screening of individual women, based on a personalized risk assessment, could be of benefit. These conclusions should be reviewed when results from the UK Trial become available. Modern screening programs such as the PQDCS may produce outcomes comparable or even superior to those observed in screening trials if they achieve a standard of quality equal to or better than the standard achieved by trials. Measures that should reduce false positive rates and assure high quality screening include making sure that high quality mammographic films are being produced, that readers have the necessary expertise to detect early cancer and avoid false positives, and double reading of a proportion of films. While participation rates should be as high as possible, efforts to increase participation should not overstate the benefits of mammography nor understate the risks and uncertainties which remain.
Authors' methods: Review
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2005
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Canada
MeSH Terms
  • Mammography
  • Mass Screening
  • Breast Neoplasms
Contact
Organisation Name: Agence d'évaluation des technologies et des modes d'intervention en santé
Contact Address: 2021, avenue Union, Bureau 10.083,Montreal, Quebec H3A S29, Canada.Tel: +1 514 873 2563; Fax: +1 514 873 1369
Contact Name: demande@inesss.qc.ca
Contact Email: demande@inesss.qc.ca
Copyright: Agence d'Evaluation des Technologies et des Modes d'Intervention en Sante (AETMIS)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.