Faecal occult blood testing for population health screening

Medical Services Advisory Committee
Record ID 32005000257
English
Authors' objectives:

The purpose of this review is to investigate the relative performance of different faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) for population health screening. The review was undertaken to provide support to the Australian Government Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot Program (the pilot).

Authors' recommendations: The MSAC considers that faecal occult blood testing is useful for population health screening to reduce CRC mortality. The available evidence indicated that there was no apparent class effect of the guaiac versus immunochemical FOBTs with regard to their effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. Different brands of FOBTs possess different sensitivities and specificities for the detection of CRC within an average risk screening population setting. The specificity of the FOBTs was a major determinant of the total associated costs of FOBT screening, inclusive of diagnostic follow-up and treatment. An economic model indicated that biennial screening was more cost-effective than annual screening, within the context of the main analysis. Lowering the minimum eligible screening age from 55 to 50 years offered benefits in terms of cost-effectiveness. Increasing the maximum screening age from 75 to 80 years did not offer the same degree of benefit. The immunochemical tests included in the assessment are no longer available and they have been replaced by newer assays. There was no available evidence suitable for the assessment of the comparative performance of currently available immunochemical tests within an average risk population health screening setting. However, the results of the analyses of the immunochemical tests used may reflect those for FOBTs with similar technical characteristics (ie, in vitro diagnostic accuracy for the detection of haemoglobin). Therefore, it is suggested that currently available and new immunochemical tests with promising technical characteristics be evaluated against established FOBTs within the context of an ongoing screening program.
Authors' methods: Systematic review
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2004
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Australia
MeSH Terms
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Mass Screening
  • Occult Blood
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
Contact
Organisation Name: Medical Services Advisory Committee
Contact Address: MSAC (MDP 107), GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Tel: +61 2 6289 6811; Fax: +61 2 6289 8799.
Contact Name: msac.secretariat@health.gov.au
Contact Email: msac.secretariat@health.gov.au
Copyright: Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.