Manual lymph drainage combined with compression therapy for arm lymphedema following breast cancer treatment - early assessment briefs (Alert)

Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care
Record ID 32005000200
Swedish
Authors' objectives:

This review aims to assess in treating arm lymphedema, to what extent manual lymph drainage combined with compression following breast cancer treatment yields better results than compression therapy alone.

Authors' results and conclusions: Three relatively small randomized controlled trials (RCT) have studied manual lymph drainage combined with compression treatment for arm lymphedema. In each of these studies, edema volume and symptoms decreased in both the study and control groups. Two of the studies, in followup directly after they ended, showed statistically significant differences in the reduction of edema and symptom that favored the group on combined treatment with manual lymph drainage. The third study, however, did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups, neither in reduced edema nor in reduced symptoms. Furthermore, the results from several case studies (including over 400 patients) clearly show that treatment with compression bandaging and manual lymph drainage had a volume-reducing effect. The design of these studies, however, does not offer the possibility to investigate the extent to which combined treatment with manual lymph drainage contributed to the reduction in lymphedema. A few patients with various types of tissue-related pain may find it difficult to tolerate the discomfort associated with compression therapy. Combined treatment with manual lymph drainage has not been shown to cause additional complications.
Authors' recommendations: Some evidence suggests that treatment involving a combination of compression therapy and manual lymph drainage yields reduced edema volume compared to compression therapy alone if volume is measured directly after the conclusion of manual lymph drainage (Evidence grade 3). There is no evidence to show that this effect is permanent. Further randomized controlled trials of sufficient size should be conducted - where treatment effects could be studied more closely in both the short and long term - before a combination of compression therapy and manual lymph drainage can be recommended. Future studies should give particular consideration to the magnitude of lymphedema since some studies suggest that early treatment for minor lymphedema may have greater effects and permanent results. Furthermore, the costs for combined therapy should be calculated and studied in relation to the potential health benefits for patients.
Authors' methods: Review
Details
Project Status: Completed
URL for project: http://www.sbu.se/Published
Year Published: 2005
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Sweden
MeSH Terms
  • Arm
  • Bandages
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Drainage
  • Lymphedema
Contact
Organisation Name: Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services
Contact Address: P.O. Box 3657, SE-103 59 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel: +46 8 4123200, Fax: +46 8 4113260
Contact Name: registrator@sbu.se
Contact Email: registrator@sbu.se
Copyright: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.