Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes

Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr K , Swinson T, Gartlehner G, Brody S, Miller WC
Record ID 32005000115
English
Authors' objectives:

This study aims to systematically review the evidence on (1) the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression, (2) the accuracy of different screening instruments, and (3) the effectiveness of interventions for women screened as high risk for perinatal depression.

Authors' results and conclusions: We identified 30 studies of prevalence. For major depression alone, point prevalence estimates ranged from 3.1 percent to 4.9 percent at different times during pregnancy and 1.0 percent to 5.9 percent at different times during the first postpartum year. For major and minor depression, estimates of the point prevalence ranged from 8.5 percent to 11.0 percent during pregnancy and 6.5 percent to 12.9 percent during the first year postpartum. However, these prevalence estimates were not significantly different from those of similarly aged non-childbearing women. Data on incidence were more limited. We identified 10 studies of screening accuracy. One small study reported on accuracy during pregnancy. For postpartum depression, screeners appeared feasible, but the small number of depressed patients involved precluded identifying an optimal screener or threshold for screening. Screening instruments studied are generally good at identifying major depression alone, with accuracy consistent with reports from primary care settings, but they performed poorer for the major or minor depression category. We found no studies directly testing whether screening improved outcomes. However, we identified 15 studies that used some sort of screening to identify women at risk of depression and for whom a subsequent intervention was provided. The results of four small studies of various psychosocial interventions during pregnancy did not demonstrate consistently superior outcomes. Results were also mixed for postpartum interventions. Six of nine studies of various psychosocial interventions reported significant improvement in depression for the experimental group. Two studies with pharmacologic interventions provided conflicting results.
Authors' recommendations: Although limited, the available research suggests that depression is one of the most common perinatal complications and that fairly accurate and feasible screening measures are available. Studies with larger sample sizes and a greater racial and ethnic mix are needed. Researchers also need to determine whether screening itself leads to better access to proven treatment and improved outcome relative to usual care.
Authors' methods: Systematic review
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2005
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: United States
MeSH Terms
  • Depression, Postpartum
  • Depressive Disorder
  • Mass Screening
  • Pregnancy Complications
Contact
Organisation Name: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Contact Address: Center for Outcomes and Evidence Technology Assessment Program, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Tel: +1 301 427 1610; Fax: +1 301 427 1639;
Contact Name: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Contact Email: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Copyright: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.