Influenza vaccination of health care workers (HCW) to reduce influenza-related outcomes in high risk patients: a systematic review of clinical and cost-effectiveness
Jordan R, Wake B, Hawker J, Boxall E, Fry-Smith A, Chen Y-F, Barton P, Albon E, Burls A
Record ID 32005000085
English
Authors' objectives:
The aim of this study is to review systematically the evidence on the effectiveness of protecting people at high risk of significant morbidity and mortality (particularly the elderly), by vaccinating health care workers (HCWs) including hospital staff, institutional care staff and community health staff against influenza.
Authors' results and conclusions:
Two cluster randomised studies were found to measure the effects on high-risk patients of vaccination of health care workers, and 27 other studies were used to provide data on important contributory issues. From the two cluster RCTs, mortality in high risk patients was reported as significantly lower (13.6% v 22.4%-odds ratio 0.58 95% CI 0.4-0.84, p=0.014 and 10% v 17%, p=0.013) in hospitals where there was a policy of HCW vaccination compared to those where there was no such policy.
No cost-effectiveness studies examining the indirect costs were identified but the two most relevant studies considering direct costs only suggested that a cost saving would be likely.
This was confirmed in a simple economic model which indicated that the programme would be cost saving by approximately 12 per vaccinee under the base-case scenario.
Authors' recommendations:
Two clinical trials suggest that vaccination of HCW would be clinically effective in reducing mortality in high-risk groups. The policy is also likely to be cost-saving, or in the worst case highly cost-effective.
In order for a policy of vaccinating healthcare workers to be implemented effectively, it will be important to overturn the perceived barriers to vaccination, especially to convince healthcare workers of the benefits to themselves and patients, and of the favourable adverse event profile. The vaccination will need to be delivered in a convenient way eg mobile cart and the whole programme more heavily promoted, implemented and monitored.
Evidence available to this review suggests that based on reasonable estimates of the key parameters a vaccination policy of HCW would be effective and probably cost-saving.
Authors' methods:
Systematic review
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-mds/haps/projects/WMHTAC/REPreports/2004/eswi.pdf
Year Published:
2004
URL for published report:
http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/activity/mds/projects/HaPS/PHEB/WMHTAC/REP/reports-list.aspx
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
England
MeSH Terms
- Health Personnel
- Influenza Vaccines
- Influenza, Human
Contact
Organisation Name:
West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration
Contact Address:
Elaena Donald-Lopez, West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT Tel: +44 121 414 7450; Fax: +44 121 414 7878
Contact Name:
louise.a.taylor@bham.ac.uk
Contact Email:
louise.a.taylor@bham.ac.uk
Copyright:
University of Birmingham
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.