Effectiveness of behavioral interventions to modify physical activity behaviors in general populations and cancer patients and survivors

Holtzman J, Schmitz K, Babes G, Kane RL, Duval S, Wilt TJ, MacDonald RM, Rutks I
Record ID 32004000658
English
Authors' objectives:

1. What is the evidence that physical activity interventions alone, or combined with diet modification or smoking cessation, are effective in helping individuals sustainably increase their aerobic physical activity? - Is the effectiveness of theoretically based interventions different? - Do hypothesized moderators affect the results of these interventions? - Do these interventions affect theoretically hypothesized mediators? - In these interventions, is there a relationship between changes in theoretically hypothesized mediators and changes in physical activity?

2. What is the evidence that physical activity interventions, alone or combined with diet modification or smoking cessation, are effective in helping cancer survivors improve their psychosocial or physiological outcomes?

Authors' results and conclusions: The range of populations, interventions, and outcomes in the included studies, as well as inadequate information provided, did not allow pooling of studies. Results were examined semi-quantitatively using whether a study was positive, significant, and, when possible, its effect size. Forty-five percent of the studies had at least one statistically significant outcome; 5.9 percent had an effect size greater than .8 and 5.9 percent were between .5 and .8. There were no clear patterns in results by setting, intensity, interventions using theory, combined interventions, and those that addressed accessibility, possibly due to the small number of studies. It was not possible to draw conclusions about mediators and moderators. Physical activity interventions in the cancer survivor populations were found to have multiple beneficial effects. The most consistent and strong findings were positive effects on vigor/vitality, cardiorespiratory fitness, quality of life, depression, anxiety, and fatigue.
Authors' recommendations: Overall, this literature is positive, but the relative magnitude of the effect is difficult to judge given the wide range of outcomes examined. The field would benefit from standardized measures and more studies examining longer outcomes. The 24 interventions reviewed indicate that physical activity is safe for cancer survivors and consistently results in improved physiologic and psychosocial outcomes. Recommendations for moving this field of research forward are provided in this report.
Authors' methods: Systematic review
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2004
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: United States
MeSH Terms
  • Exercise
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Neoplasms
Contact
Organisation Name: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Contact Address: Center for Outcomes and Evidence Technology Assessment Program, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Tel: +1 301 427 1610; Fax: +1 301 427 1639;
Contact Name: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Contact Email: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Copyright: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.