[Effectiveness and safety of robotic surgery: total hysterectomy for endometrial cancer, radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, and partial nephrectomy for renal cancer]
Attieh R, Cloutier I, Morrow G, Rousseau A
Record ID 32018015695
French
Original Title:
Efficacité et innocuité de la chirurgie robotique ‒ Hystérectomie totale en cas de cancer de l’endomètre, prostatectomie radicale en cas de cancer de la prostate et néphrectomie partielle en cas de cancer du rein
Authors' objectives:
With a view to acquainting itself with the effectiveness safety and cost-effectiveness of
robotic surgery, the Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux’s Surgical Services
Division (which has been transferred to Santé Québec) mandated the Institut national
d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux to analyze the evidence concerning the use
of surgical robots to perform total hysterectomies for endometrial cancer, radical
prostatectomies for prostate cancer, and partial nephrectomies for renal cancer.
Authors' results and conclusions:
RESULTS: (#1 ROBOTIC SURGERY: AN APPROACH AT LEAST COMPARABLE TO LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY AND
OPEN SURGERY): Overall, it appears that robotic surgery is at least comparable to laparoscopic surgery and
open surgery in terms of clinical and organizational effectiveness and safety for the three
indications of interest. (#2 KEY POINTS ABOUT ROBOTIC TOTAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR ENDOMETRIAL CANCER): The comparable outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic total hysterectomy
were bilateral lymph node detection, recurrence-free survival, length of hospital
stay, the probability of hospital readmission for any reason, the probability of
overall complications of any severity, and the estimated blood loss during the
procedure. (#3 KEY POINTS ABOUT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER): The outcomes compared between robotic and open radical prostatectomy were
urinary continence recovery 12 months after surgery, biochemical recurrence-free
survival, health-related quality of life, and the probability of positive surgical
margins, of hospital readmission for any reason and of major complications. (#4 KEY POINTS ABOUT ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR KIDNEY CANCER): The comparable outcomes between robotic partial nephrectomy and open surgery
were warm ischemia time, the probability of positive surgical margins, the
probability of trifecta, and the estimated blood loss. CONCLUSION: The analysis shows that robotic surgery is at least comparable to laparoscopic surgery
and open surgery in terms of safety, clinical and organizational effectiveness for the three
indications of interest. However, given the limitations associated with the data and
methodology of the included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.
Authors' methods:
A structured literature search in six bibliographic databases was conducted,
targeting systematic reviews with meta-analyses, randomized and non-randomized
comparative studies, economic studies, clinical practice guides, guidelines, and health
technology assessment reports. These publications had to contain data on the clinical
and organizational effectiveness, health-related quality of life, safety and costeffectiveness of robotic surgery – more specifically, on systems where the surgeon is
entirely responsible for execution – compared with laparoscopic surgery or open surgery.
The structured literature search was conducted for each indication and covered the
period from January 2015 to December 2023. Depending on the indication, one or two
updates to the search were carried out in 2024 in four bibliographic databases. To find
publications containing recommendations or systematic reviews not indexed in the
bibliographic databases, the websites of health technology assessment agencies,
professional medical associations and learned societies in the field were consulted, as
were the Google and Google Scholar search engines.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
Year Published:
2026
URL for published report:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/Rapports/Technologies/Chirurgie_robotique_Hysterect_prostatect_nephrect_EC_INESSS.pdf
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Other
Country:
Canada
Province:
Quebec
MeSH Terms
- Robotic Surgical Procedures
- Endometrial Neoplasms
- Hysterectomy
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Prostatectomy
- Nephrectomy
- Kidney Neoplasms
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
- Laparoscopy
Contact
Organisation Name:
Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux
Contact Address:
L'Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux (INESSS) , 2021, avenue Union, bureau 10.083, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2S9;Tel: 1+514-873-2563, Fax: 1+514-873-1369
Contact Name:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Contact Email:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Copyright:
L'Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux (INESSS)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.