[Safety, effectiveness and efficiency of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusión of the aorta (REBOA)]

Carmona M, Rodríguez Arbaizar J, León Salas B, Pedrosa Pérez L, Imaz Iglesia I
Record ID 32018015629
Spanish
Original Title: Seguridad, efectividad y eficiencia del Catéter de Resucitación Endovascular para Oclusión de la Aorta (REBOA)
Authors' objectives: To determine the safety, effectiveness and efficiency of the REBOA technique in patients with abdominal, retroperitoneal and pelvic haemorrhage or with Placental accreta spectrum disorder (PAD).
Authors' results and conclusions: CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic REBOA • Therapeutic REBOA is effective in reducing 24-hour mortality when compared to resuscitative thoracotomy (OR= 0.26; 95%CI: 0.20 – 0.34). The certainty of the evidence was assessed as low. • Overall, REBOA reduces in-hospital mortality compared to any comparator (OR= 0.90; 95%CI: 0.81 – 0.99) (very low certainty of evidence). Especially in the comparison with TR (OR= 0.30; 95%CI: 0.26 – 0.35), the certainty of evidence was assessed as moderate. • REBOA also improves systolic blood pressure after occlusion more than any comparator (MD= 41.03 mmHg; 95% CI: 36.77 – 45.29). The certainty of the evidence was assessed as low. • REBOA is less safe than its comparators in terms of lower limb amputation, acute kidney damage, paraplegia with a certainty of evidence rated as low. and acute lung damage, with a certainty of evidence rated as very low. • REBOA wouldn’t be efficient according to the only identified study in the UK context comparing with TR. Preventive REBOA • REBOA reduces the number of hysterectomies when used as a preventive measure in deliveries of women with PAD (OR= 0.21; 95%CI: 0.08 – 0.53). Certainty of evidence rated as low. • Preventive REBOA also reduces the number of women admitted to the ICU (OR= 0.18; 95%CI: 0.08 – 0.42) (certainty of evidence very low). Similarly, preventive REBOA reduces transfusion requirements and the duration of surgery for women with PAD (certainty of evidence very low). • Preventive REBOA has no more adverse effects or complications than its comparators (certainty of evidence very low).
Authors' methods: A systematic review of the available scientific literature on the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of REBOA in patients with traumatic abdomino-pelvic haemorrhage (therapeutic REBOA) or with PAD (preventive REBOA) was carried out.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2024
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Full HTA
Country: Spain
MeSH Terms
  • Placenta Accreta
  • Hemorrhage
  • Abdominal Injuries
  • Aorta, Abdominal
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
  • Aortic Rupture
  • Balloon Occlusion
  • Postpartum Hemorrhage
  • Endovascular Procedures
Keywords
  • REBOA
  • Endovascular occlusion
  • Abdominopelvic hemorrhage
  • Aortic occlusion
  • Placenta accreta spectrum
Contact
Organisation Name: Agencia de Evaluacion de Tecnologias Sanitarias
Contact Address: Instituto de Salud "Carlos III", Calle Sinesio Delgado 6, Pabellon 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain. Tel: +34 9 1 822 2005; Fax: +34 9 1 387 7841;
Contact Name: Esther E. García Carpintero
Contact Email: eegarcia@isciii.es
Copyright: Agencia de Evaluacion de Tecnologias Sanitarias
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.