Mammographic surveillance in breast cancer patients aged 50 years or older: a synopsis of the Mammo-50 RCT
Dunn J, Donnelly P, Marshall A, Elbeltagi N, Hopkins A, Ramirez M, Thompson A, Audisio R, Pinder S, Cameron D, Hartup S, Wilcox M, Turner L, Young A, Higgins H, Watson E, Gasson S, Barrett-Lee P, Hulme C, Shinkins B, Hall P, Evans A
Record ID 32018015596
English
Authors' objectives:
Annual surveillance mammograms for an unspecified period, after treatment for early breast cancer, are widely practised in the United States of America and Europe. Current UK guidelines recommend annual mammograms for 5 years, then reverts to 3-yearly screening. The aim of this trial was to evaluate whether less than annual mammography was non-inferior in terms of breast cancer-specific survival and cost-effectiveness in women aged 50 years or older at diagnosis and 3 years post curative surgery.
Authors' results and conclusions:
Five thousand two hundred and thirty-five women were randomised between April 2014 and September 2018. With a median of 5.7-year follow-up, 343 women have died, of whom 116 died of breast cancer (61 on annual arm; 55 on less-frequent arm). Breast cancer-specific-survival at 5 years was 98% on both arms with a hazard ratio of 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 1.32), which demonstrated non-inferiority of less-frequent mammograms at the 3% margin (non-inferiority pā
Authors' methods:
We conducted a multicentre, randomised phase III trial of annual mammography versus less-frequent mammography (2-yearly after conservation surgery or 3-yearly after mastectomy). Women were eligible if aged ā„ 50 years at initial diagnosis of breast cancer (invasive or ductal carcinoma in situ) and recurrence-free 3 years post curative surgery. The trial was conducted at 114 NHS hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned (1ā
:ā
1) to annual or less-frequent mammograms; followed up for 6 years. Coprimary outcomes were breast cancer-specific-survival and cost-effectiveness; secondary outcomes included recurrence-free interval and overall survival. Analyses were by intention to treat, with a pre-planned per-protocol analysis. Planned sample size was 5000. Clinical results are now reported. Adherence to the mammographic schedules was 76%, though the per-protocol analysis showed no difference compared to the intention to treat results. The majority of the participants had small lower-grade oestrogen receptor-positive tumours and were from a White ethnic group.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta/NIHR136192
Year Published:
2026
URL for published report:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/GJJD0722
URL for additional information:
English
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Full HTA
Country:
England, United Kingdom
DOI:
10.3310/GJJD0722
MeSH Terms
- Breast Neoplasms
- Mammography
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Early Detection of Cancer
- Time Factors
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Contact
Organisation Name:
NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
Contact Address:
NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.