Duration of external neck stabilisation in the management of older and frail patients with a new odontoid fracture: the DENS RCT

Brennan PM, Adamczyk M, Closs M, Copley P, Cranswick G, Eborall H, Edlmann E, Keerie C, Oatey K, Khan S, Lawton J, Lowe D, Norrie J, Niven A, Rayson P, Reed M, Rodriguez A, Selby B, Shekhar H, Shenkin S, Sorbara P, Statham P, Stoddart A, Tomlinson J, Waddell J, Woodfield J, DENS Study Team
Record ID 32018015512
English
Authors' objectives: Fractures of the cervical spine’s odontoid process can result from low-impact falls in frail or older adults, and are usually managed in hard collars to immobilise the fracture and promote bony healing. However, bony healing often does not occur in older/frail adults and is not necessary for good outcomes. Further, hard collars can cause complications, such as skin pressure ulcers, and difficulties with swallowing or personal care. To examine whether management of odontoid process fractures without hard collar immobilisation is associated with improved quality of life in older/frail patients.
Authors' results and conclusions: The study was terminated prematurely because of slow recruitment. One hundred and thirty-eight patients were randomised with. 83.3% aged > 75 years old and. 72.5% of fractures being odontoid type 2. Mean number of days in collar 0.2 (standard deviation 1.4) for early removal of collar participants, and 55.5 days (standard deviation 38.0) for standard management participants; 15.6% of standard management participants crossed over, 3.0% of early removal of collar participants. Twenty-eight days after randomisation, 80 patients (61.5%) were not wearing a collar. Primary end-point assessment (EuroQol 5 dimension instrument five-level version at 12 weeks), based on intention-to-treat analysis, mean score 0.650 (standard error 0.039, 0.490 to 0.86) in early removal of collar group and 0.0667 (standard error 0.040, 0.51 to 0.89) in standard management group. Pre-specified subgroup analysis by fracture type (p = 0.3645), Rockwood score (p = 0.6593) and age (p = 0.4088) were non-significant. Qualitative study participants reported decreased autonomy following the fracture. Standard management patients reported additional negative impacts. There was need for better information about the injury, ‘normal’ recovery and return to activities. Seventeen patients died; 10 (17.2%) early removal of collar group, 7 (9.8%) standard management group [odds ratio = 1.92 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 6.04), p = 0.266]. No deaths directly related to fracture or trial allocation. Clinicians should consider prioritising independence and comfort of older/frail patients with odontoid fracture by early collar removal. This study supports that this can be achieved without a clear detriment to the patient.
Authors' methods: The Duration of External Neck Stabilisation trial was a non-blinded randomised controlled trial with a nested qualitative study. Aimed to recruit 887 participants from 25 United Kingdom hospitals, over 2 years. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 65 years, or with Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale of ≥ 5. Comparing early hard collar removal (intervention) with standard management in a hard collar for 12 weeks. Primary outcome measure: quality of life 12 weeks following randomisation. EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version. The study opened in 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The recruited population is underpowered considering the planned sample size. The qualitative analysis revealed several obstacles to trial recruitment, including loss of equipoise.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2026
URL for additional information: English
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Full HTA
Country: England, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
  • Fractures, Bone
  • Odontoid Process
  • Spinal Fractures
  • Aged
  • Frail Elderly
  • Pain
  • Braces
Contact
Organisation Name: NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
Contact Address: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name: journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email: journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.