[Biomarkers as support in decision-making for computed tomography in mild head injury in adults – a systematic review and assessment of medical, economical and ethical aspects]

Oredsson S, Bondesson E, Wikström E, Sandqvist K, Steen Carlsson K
Record ID 32018015147
English
Original Title: Biomarkörer som stöd inför beslut om datortomografi vid lätt huvudskada hos vuxna: En systematisk översikt och utvärdering av medicinska, hälsoekonomiska, etiska och organisatoriska aspekter
Authors' objectives: The objective of this report is to assess the ability of the biomarkers S100B, GFAP, UCHL-1, and NF-L to exclude trauma-related findings on CT in adult patients with mild head injury and to evaluate if biomarker analysis in blood can safely reduce CT usage. Additionally, to examine the health economic impact of adopting biomarker analysis compared to current practices.
Authors' results and conclusions: Key Message • Analysis of S100B, GFAP, or the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 in blood demonstrates equally good ability to identify adult patients with trauma-related findings on CT. The scientific certainty, according to GRADE, is moderate for GFAP and the combination of GFAP+UCH-L1, and low for S100B. For UCH-L1 alone, the scientific evidence is too limited to draw any conclusions. • In a hypothetical group of 1000 patients with mild head injury and an expected ten percent presence of trauma-related findings on CT, the number of missed injuries corresponds to two patients for GFAP, three patients for GFAP+UCH-L1, and four patients for S100B. • The need for CT could probably be reduced by approximately 30 percent if analysis of GFAP, GFAP+UCH-L1, or S100B is used in the assessment of patients with mild head injury. • Model-based health economic cost analyses indicate that biomarkers may be cost-saving. Results are sensitive to price of biomarker tests and unit costs of computed tomography. 3 (120)
Authors' methods: A systematic search of articles in several databases was conducted in May 2025 and repeated in November 2025. Selected studies were assessed at abstract and full-text levels by at least two independent authors, with inclusion decisions made by consensus. The studies underwent critical appraisal, and relevant data were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the ability of the biomarkers S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1, and the combination GFAP+UCH-L1 to correctly identify patients without changes on CT. Data on the number of false-negative results, where the biomarker analysis incorrectly indicated no changes on CT, were collected when available. The certainty of the results was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Articles with health economic analyses were evaluated by a health economist.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2026
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Full HTA
Country: Sweden
MeSH Terms
  • Biomarkers
  • Brain Concussion
  • Craniocerebral Trauma
  • Brain Injuries
  • Brain Injuries, Traumatic
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Adult
Keywords
  • mild traumatic brain injury
  • mTBI
  • biomarkers
  • S100B
  • GFAP
  • UCH-L1
  • CT scan
Contact
Organisation Name: HTA South
Contact Address: Skåne University Hospital, Lund
Contact Name: hta.syd@skane.se
Contact Email: hta.syd@skane.se
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.