Dismantling behavioural weight management interventions: component network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and real-world services
Jaiswal N, Gregg R, Hawkins N, Sharif-Hurst S, Avenell A, Ells L, Jayacodi S, Mackenzie R, Simpson SA, Wu O, Logue J
Record ID 32018014768
English
Authors' objectives:
Behavioural weight management interventions are complex interventions having several coexisting components designed to facilitate weight loss. Existing evidence has shown behavioural weight management interventions to be effective; however, the magnitude of weight loss varies among programmes. There is value in understanding whether differences in the intervention components influence the overall effectiveness of the interventions. The current study is the first attempt to explore the effects of individual components of interventions using data from both randomised controlled trials and real-world services based in the United Kingdom. To deconstruct behavioural weight management interventions into constituent components and identify the effectiveness of individual components for weight loss.
Authors' results and conclusions:
In the analysis of randomised controlled trials, significant weight loss was associated with components tailoring (mean difference −5.54 kg; 95% credible interval −7.72 to −3.35), flexibility in attendance (mean difference −3.18 kg; 95% credible interval −4.29 to −2.07) and multimodal referral (mean difference −2.57 kg; 95% credible interval −4.89 to −0.25). In real-world services, the components associated with significant weight loss included multimodal referral (mean difference −2.01, 95% credible interval −2.13 to −1.88), personalised dietary advice (mean difference −1.22, 95% credible interval −1.33 to −1.11), flexibility (mean difference −0.41, 95% credible interval −0.47 to −0.35) and in-person delivery (mean difference −0.45, 95% credible interval −0.52 to −0.38). However, co-design (mean difference 3.46 kg; 95% credible interval 2.12 to 4.82) in randomised controlled trials, and added extras (mean difference 0.99 kg; 95% credible interval 0.88 to 1.10) and tailoring (mean difference 0.33 kg; 95% credible interval 0.27 to 0.40) in real-world services, were not shown to be effective in short-term weight loss. The findings from this study highlight the importance of understanding the impact of intervention components such as accessibility, flexibility, tailoring and dietary advice and in-person delivery in weight loss at 12 weeks. Future research should consider exploring the component interactions and long-term weight loss for improved understanding and developing effective programmes.
Authors' methods:
A component network meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials and real-world services. Real-world services and randomised controlled trials based in the United Kingdom for weight management in adults. Adults over 18 years of age, living in the United Kingdom and attending behavioural weight management interventions in the real world (n = 76,201) or participating in randomised controlled trials (n = 4051). Bayesian two-staged component network meta-analysis using an additive model.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta/NIHR135918
Year Published:
2025
URL for published report:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/published-articles/GJJL0630
URL for additional information:
English
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Full HTA
Country:
England, United Kingdom
DOI:
10.3310/GJJL0630
MeSH Terms
- Obesity
- Obesity Management
- Weight Loss
- Behavior Therapy
- Weight Reduction Programs
- Self-Help Groups
Contact
Organisation Name:
NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
Contact Address:
NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.