Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study
Mistry HD, Silverio SA, Duncan E, Easter A, von Dadelszen P, Magee LA
Record ID 32018014554
English
Authors' objectives:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, significant reconfigurations were made to maternity care, to deliver this essential service while minimising the risk of infection for pregnant/post partum women and their infants, initially considered to be more vulnerable.
Authors' results and conclusions:
Work package 1 Among women of reproductive age (8 December 2020–15 February 2021), older age, white ethnicity and a lack of social deprivation were associated with higher vaccine uptake, although ethnicity exerted the strongest effect (Office for National Statistics data). Across pre-pandemic, pandemic with and pandemic without lockdowns, pregnancy outcomes, over time, largely followed pre-pandemic trends (record linkage, South London). However, virtual antenatal care in the second and third trimesters was associated with an excess of adverse pregnancy outcomes (and increased costs). Our findings suggest that maternity care provision, although altered substantially, largely preserved pregnancy outcomes, although experiences of care receipt and delivery were poorer. Costs may have been lower because less care was sought, although virtual (vs. face-to-face) care was more expensive. There is evidence to suggest that the current context of maternity care is of a demoralised and depleted workforce. Implementing a coproduction learning health system could offer needed solutions to improve maternity care delivery, experiences of care and workplace culture, building resilience to withstand future health system shocks.
Authors' methods:
This mixed-methods study had three work packages. Work package 1 used quantitative methods to analyse pregnancy outcomes over time, considering service reconfiguration and inequalities, using routinely collected maternity and offspring data from three diverse South London trusts. Work package 2 involved in-depth interviews with a diverse sample of pregnant/post partum women, partners, healthcare professionals and policy-makers, and used thematic framework analysis. Systematic reviews were undertaken of women’s experiences of receiving maternity care during the pandemic, and healthcare professionals’ experiences of providing that care. Questionnaires (October–December 2021 and August–September 2022) were administered nationally via the King’s College London COVID Symptom Study Biobank, to evaluate vaccine uptake among women who were planning pregnancy, pregnant or post partum. Work package 3 engaged stakeholders within maternity systems through regional Listening Events and a national Policy Lab.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hsdr/NIHR134293
Year Published:
2025
URL for published report:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/HHTE6611
URL for additional information:
English
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Full HTA
Country:
England, United Kingdom
DOI:
10.3310/HHTE6611
MeSH Terms
- Hospitals, Maternity
- Prenatal Care
- Maternal Health Services
- Pregnancy
- State Medicine
- Delivery of Health Care
- COVID-19
- Remote Consultation
- SARS-CoV-2
Contact
Organisation Name:
NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme
Contact Address:
NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.