[Proton pump inhibitors: deprescription and lifestyle changes]
Duplain-Cyr G, Laffont B
Record ID 32018014551
French
Original Title:
Inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons : déprescription et modification des habitudes de vie
Authors' objectives:
This report constitutes the second
phase of the work, the objective of which is to equip front-line health professionals to
deprescribe PPIs and to acquaint them with the recommended strategies for lifestyle
changes that can provide symptomatic relief of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
and dyspepsia in adults.
Authors' results and conclusions:
RESULTS (#1 PPI THERAPY SHOULD BE REEVALUATED IN THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN TAKING IT FOR MORE THAN 8
WEEKS WITH NO INDICATION JUSTIFYING ITS LONG-TERM USE): In the presence of an indication for long-term treatment, deprescription is not
recommended, but consideration should be given to reducing the intake to a once-daily
dose in those taking a PPI twice daily. If there are persistent symptoms despite optimal
adherence to PPI therapy and no condition justifying long-term treatment, the PPI should
generally be discontinued because of its ineffectiveness. Consideration could be given to
looking for other causes that might explain the symptoms and to conducting an additional
investigation. (#2 THE DIFFERENT PPI DEPRESCRIPTION APPROACHES ARE DOSE REDUCTION, ON-DEMAND
DOSING, AND COMPLETE DISCONTINUATION): The choice between the different PPI deprescription strategies should be discussed
between the person and health professional. Symptoms may reappear transiently when
the PPI is discontinued or when the dose is reduced, but these symptoms do no warrant
restarting the drug. Certain strategies for relieving these symptoms are proposed, such
as using antacids or an H2 receptor antagonist or taking a PPI only as needed, in
addition to lifestyle changes. Certain lifestyle changes concerning eating habits, sleep,
stress management, physical activity and smoking and alcohol consumption should be
discussed with the persons concerned. (#3 A PPI DEPRESCRIPTION FOLLOW-UP SHOULD INCLUDE A SYMPTOM REASSESSMENT AND
ADVICE CONCERNING THE OTHER APPROACHES, PHARMACOLOGIAL OR OTHERWISE): A close follow-up (i.e., after 4 to 12 weeks) is recommended after a PPI is despresribed
and should ideally be done under the responsibility of the community pharmacist. The
objective of the follow-up should be to reassess and record the presence of GERD or
dyspepsia symptoms, in particular, their frequency and severity, and the effectiveness of
the nonpharmacological measures or other treatments. Returning to the previous
effective dose may be considered if the symptoms persist after the discontinuation or
dose reduction, if the PPI interferes with the person’s daily activities or if they do not
obtain relief with the other approaches, pharmacological or otherwise. If applicable, a
follow-up should be done in 4 to 12 weeks with a view to considering a new
deprescription attempt. If the treatment is continued, the subsequent follow-up can be
done annually. CONCLUSION: The PPI deprescription decision algorithm is based on clinical practice recommendations,
which were supplemented with the perspectives of the stakeholders consulted, including
those of patients, and contextualized for Québec practice. This tool should help enhance
and harmonize the practice and contribute to the effective management of persons in
whom deprescribing a PPI is indicated. However, the enhancement and harmonization of
the practice will depend on :
• The dissemination of the decision algorithm;
• The adherence to the changes and the uptake of the recommendations by the
health professionals concerned;
• The availability of training, when needed; and
• The promotion of this tool within the health and social services system
Authors' methods:
For this phase, a rapid review of the literature containing information and clinical
recommendations concerning PPI desprescription and lifestyle changes for relieving the
symptoms of dyspepsia and GERD was carried out on publications found in bibliographic
databases and other information sources. The data and contextual elements gathered
were analyzed and synthesized with a view to contextualizing the practice in Québec,
based mainly on legislative, regulatory and organizational contextual information specific
to Québec and on the perspectives of the different stakeholders who were consulted.
These perspectives were gathered by means of an advisory committee consisting of
health professionals from different specialties and areas of expertise. The perspectives of
current and past PPI users regarding the acceptability issues relating to PPI
depresciption and to lifestyle changes were gathered by means of one-on-one interviews.
Lastly, the overall quality of the work, its acceptability and its applicability were assessed
by external reviewers specializing in the field of interest and by future users who did not
participate in the project.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/publications/repertoire-des-publications/publication/usage-optimal-a-long-terme-des-inhibiteurs-de-la-pompe-a-protons.html
Year Published:
2025
URL for published report:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/Rapports/Medicaments/Inhibiteur_pompe_protons_Volet_2_GN_INESSS.pdf
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Other
Country:
Canada
Province:
Quebec
MeSH Terms
- Proton Pump Inhibitors
- Dexlansoprazole
- Esomeprazole
- Lansoprazole
- Omeprazole
- Pantoprazole
- Rabeprazole
- Deprescriptions
- Drug Utilization Review
- Inappropriate Prescribing
- Life Style
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
Contact
Organisation Name:
Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux
Contact Address:
L'Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux (INESSS) , 2021, avenue Union, bureau 10.083, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2S9;Tel: 1+514-873-2563, Fax: 1+514-873-1369
Contact Name:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Contact Email:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Copyright:
L'Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux (INESSS)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.