A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study

Bucci S, Varese F, Quayle E, Cartwright K, Larkin A, Chan C, Chitsabesan P, Green V, Hewins W, Machin M, Newton A, Niebauer E, Norrie J, Radford G, Richards C, Sandys M, Selby V, Shafi S, Ward J, Whelan P, Schwannauer M
Record ID 32018014420
English
Authors' objectives: No evidence-based support for young people who have experienced technology-assisted sexual abuse exists. The project’s aims were to develop a digital intervention that improves mentalisation (the ability to understand the minds of oneself and others that underlies behaviour) to reduce the risk for revictimisation and future harm and improve young people’s resilience. To co-design a mentalisation-based digital intervention; determine its feasibility, acceptability, safety and usability; and determine how to best integrate this into practice.
Authors' results and conclusions: Between May 2022 and March 2023, 147 young people were screened for eligibility for the feasibility clinical trial; 72 referrals were made and 43 young people were allocated to receive the intervention. We found that it was possible to recruit and retain participants to this trial. Quantitative and qualitative data showed that the i-Minds app was safe, acceptable and associated with promising signals of efficacy on valuable outcomes post treatment, including technology-assisted-sexual-abuse-related post-traumatic symptoms, resilience, internalising symptoms and reflective functioning. Most participants accessed or completed app modules. User feedback indicated that participants had a positive experience using the app, positively increasing their knowledge/understanding of their own mental health and their motivation to address their mental health difficulties. Practitioners identified the barriers to implementing i-Minds into routine practice as not being involved in its design at the outset, possible impact on workload and whether digital health interventions might replace routine care. Facilitators included the distinct nature and specificity of the i-Minds app for the target group and its ability to support young people on service waiting lists. A mentalisation-based digital intervention is feasible, acceptable and safe. A larger-scale evaluation appears warranted. Further service improvements are required for routine assessment and support for young people experiencing technology-assisted sexual abuse.
Authors' methods: A mixed-methods, non-randomised study in young people aged 12–18 years exposed to technology-assisted sexual abuse across two United Kingdom sites. We adapted an existing mentalisation-based therapy manual and co-designed a digital health intervention (app) using participatory methods. Recommendations from our pre-trial qualitative work with healthcare professionals supporting young people with technology-assisted sexual abuse and lived experience consultation informed app development and trial procedures. The primary outcome was the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the digital intervention measured against relevant fields of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for feasibility studies. Intervention safety was reported against an adverse events procedure. Usability was guided by the framework for analysing and measuring usage and engagement data in digital interventions. Acceptability was examined using qualitative methods. The planned sample size of the feasibility clinical trial was 60 young people. There was limited ethnic diversity in the samples, reflecting potential selection bias at the referral point. Sexual orientation is not reported in the trial. The trial lacked randomisation and a control group, limiting interpretation of post-treatment improvements.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2025
URL for additional information: English
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Full HTA
Country: England, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
  • Sex Offenses
  • Adolescent
  • Mental Health
  • Mobile Applications
  • Resilience, Psychological
  • Digital Health
  • Smartphone
  • Mental Health Services
Contact
Organisation Name: NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme
Contact Address: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name: journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email: journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.