Barriers to and outcomes of unspecified kidney donation in the UK: BOUnD, a mixed-methods study
Mamode N, Norton S, McCrone P, Chilcot J, Draper H, Gogalniceanu P, Zuchowski M, Burnapp L, Shorrock J, Gupta K, Maple H
Record ID 32018014271
English
Authors' objectives:
Unspecified living kidney donation, where an individual donates a kidney to a stranger, is practised in very few countries. Since the Human Tissue Act 2006, the practice has been increasingly prevalent in the United Kingdom. However, evidence exists of uncertainty from healthcare professionals as to whether this is appropriate or manageable. The Barriers and Outcomes in Unspecified Donation study is a mixed-methods study designed to determine the answers to three research questions: Is there variation in transplant professionals’ practice and attitudes, which is preventing some unspecified donations? Are psychosocial and physical outcomes after unspecified donation equivalent to those after specified donation? What is the economic benefit from unspecified donation?
Authors' results and conclusions:
RQ1 Fifty-nine interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals at six United Kingdom centres. There was broad support for unspecified donation, but key themes included the need for further training and information, consistency in approach across the United Kingdom, and uncertainty about age limits and psychological assessments. Managing donor expectations was a major concern. One hundred and fifty-three healthcare professionals, from all 23 United Kingdom transplant units, were recruited into the questionnaire study. The themes above were confirmed, and the need for more resource, particularly training and staffing, were emphasised. This study suggests that unspecified donation is a safe and acceptable practice. Training and information should be disseminated across United Kingdom centres, with increased resource for unspecified donation where necessary. Consistency in approach and support for donors who do not proceed is important.
Authors' methods:
For RQ1, a qualitative study of healthcare professionals using focus groups and interviews was performed. Additionally, a quantitative, questionnaire-based study, including healthcare professionals from all United Kingdom transplant centres, was carried out. For RQ2, a qualitative study of unspecified kidney donors, including those who did not donate, was performed. A prospective, questionnaire study of both specified kidney donors and unspecified kidney donors across the United Kingdom was completed, and linked to data recorded by National Health Service Blood and Transplant. For RQ3, data on utilisation and quality of life were collected pre- and postoperatively using health economic and quality-of-life questionnaires to allow calculation of costs and comparisons between unspecified kidney donors and specified kidney donors.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hsdr/NIHR135888
Year Published:
2025
URL for published report:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/RTEW9328
URL for additional information:
English
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Full HTA
Country:
England, United Kingdom
DOI:
10.3310/RTEW9328
MeSH Terms
- Kidney Transplantation
- Organ Transplantation
- Living Donors
- Altruism
- Tissue and Organ Harvesting
- Attitude of Health Personnel
Contact
Organisation Name:
NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme
Contact Address:
NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.