Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity

Medical Services Advisory Committee
Record ID 32004000178
English
Authors' objectives:

This report is a systematic review of the literature on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) for morbid obesity. Two questions were developed and are covered in this report:

- What is the value of LAGB in the treatment of morbidly obese patients (BMI >= 35 kg/m2) who have failed to lose weight through non-surgical means compared with vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG)?

- What is the value of LAGB in the treatment of morbidly obese patients (BMI >=35 kg/m2) who have failed to lose weight through non-surgical means comparedwith open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)?

Authors' results and conclusions: Conclusions pertaining to the effectiveness of LAGB are based upon level III and level IV evidence. No randomised trials of LAGB against open RYGB or VBG were identified. LAGB is less efficacious than RYGB in terms of weight loss. There is some evidence that RYGB patients may be happier with their procedure than LAGB patients. Length of hospital stay and length of procedure appear to be lower in LAGB patients. On the basis of the available evidence it appears that LAGB is as efficacious as VBG in terms of weight loss. There is some preliminary evidence that weight loss is maintained longer in patients undergoing LAGB than in patients undergoing VBG. There do not appear to be any significant differences between quality of life measures, length of procedure, or length of hospital stay in patients with VBG or LAGB. There is no evidence that any of the three procedures are significantly better at resolving obesity related co-morbidities than any of the other procedures. Follow-up information on a very limited number of patients included in level IV reports indicates that weight loss may be maintained up to seven years after an LAGB procedure.
Authors' recommendations: MSAC recommended that on the strength of evidence pertaining to safety, effectivenessand cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, public funding should be continued for this procedure.
Authors' methods: Systematic review
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2003
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Australia
MeSH Terms
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Laparoscopy
  • Obesity
Contact
Organisation Name: Medical Services Advisory Committee
Contact Address: MSAC (MDP 107), GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Tel: +61 2 6289 6811; Fax: +61 2 6289 8799.
Contact Name: msac.secretariat@health.gov.au
Contact Email: msac.secretariat@health.gov.au
Copyright: Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.