[Guides and standards: COVID-19 - optimal use of parmacological treatments]
Laffont B
Record ID 32018013308
French
Original Title:
COVID-19 : usage optimal des traitements pharmacologiques
Authors' objectives:
In Quebec, according to the most recent data published in Winter 2024, more than 1.4
million people contracted coronavirus (COVID-19) disease, of whom more than 20,000
died. Unlike other respiratory viruses, severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2
is not, to date, a seasonal virus. In fact, cases of infection and hospitalization associated
with COVID-19 persist throughout the year. Between March 2020 and February 2024, the
Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), which has been
mobilized since the start of the pandemic, conducted work that led to the development of
several clinical tools, continuously updated in line with advances in knowledge, on drugs
administered for the pharmacological treatment of people with COVID-19. Considering
the end of continuous scientific monitoring of COVID-19 treatments, the rapid response
method used during the pandemic and the multiplicity of these clinical tools, the INESSS
has decided to conduct work, according to its usual scientific process, in order to publish
an optimal use guide covering all treatments.
Authors' results and conclusions:
RESULTS (#1 RECOGNIZING THE RISK OF COVID-19 COMPLICATIONS FOR OPTIMIZED THERAPEUTIC
MANAGEMENT): As vaccination waves and campaigns have evolved, so have the characteristics of those
most likely to develop complications from COVID-19. In fact, immunity conferred by
previous infection and/or vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are factors that contribute to
reducing the risk of COVID-19 complications, although the further one is from the last
vaccine dose, or the last infection, the weaker the protection. Because of the large
proportion of people immunized by vaccination or previous infections, the likelihood of
developing serious complications from the infection has been greatly reduced in the
population since Omicron, and this trend is continuing. For many, a simple supportive
treatment will be required, while for others, depending on the anticipated risk level of
complications, an antiviral may be administered. (#2 TREATMENTS FOR EVERY SEVERITY LEVEL): n ambulatory care, or in the presence of a person hospitalized for a reason other than
COVID-19, but infected with SARS-CoV-2, the decision whether or not to resort to early
treatment against COVID-19 is essentially based on the risk of complications. Thus, in
order to move towards optimal use of pharmacological treatment options, it is important
to gather information on the risk level of complications associated with individuals
according to their age, immunity, and comorbidities. The World Health Organization
(WHO) recently proposed a stratification according to people's hospitalization level risk,
whereby those at moderate to high risk could or should, respectively, receive early
treatment against COVID-19. Thus, when the eligibility criteria for early treatment are
met, the first-line treatment is nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. In the presence of a contraindication
or drug interaction with ritonavir, remdesivir is an alternative option.
When a person's condition requires hospitalization for COVID-19, it is important to
determine the scale and severity level of the disease, in order to optimize the clinical gain
expected from taking the medication. In this respect, the WHO ordinal scale, which
associates a category with the need for respiratory or cardiorespiratory assistance, is
clinically relevant, especially as all studies on pharmacological treatments are based on
it. Thus, standards of care differ according to the severity level of the disease and the
category at which the person hospitalized with COVID-19 is categorized. Three drug
classes are included in the standard of care in this context: antivirals, anticoagulants, and
immunomodulators.(#3 FOLLOW-UP FOCUSED ON PREVENTING FUTURE RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS): Although rare in the current epidemiological context, follow-up by the clinician can
sometimes be established in the presence of a more vulnerable patient, such as an
immunosuppressed patient. However, the most important thing is to encourage the
patient to get vaccinated to prevent future respiratory infections - e.g. influenza,
pneumococcus, SARS-CoV-2. (#4 ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE WORK): The discontinuation of the free distribution of antigenic screening tests in pharmacies for
the general population, combined with the public's lack of awareness of free access to
rapid tests, or to an RT-PCR test, at local service points, poses challenges, particularly
for people at risk of complications. To benefit from the advantages associated with early
treatment, 5 to 7 days must separate the taking of the medication from the appearance of
the first symptoms. Added to this is the lack of awareness of the existence of early
treatment among people who could benefit from it, and who are unaware that they should
at least consult a clinician in the event of infection due to their health status. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 has a substantial impact on resource utilization, resulting in repeated visits to
family practice groups and emergency departments by people with mild COVID-19, or
hospital stays, and even intensive care in the most severe cases. Education in the
prevention of respiratory infections through vaccination, as well as the behaviours to
adopt to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 or other respiratory viruses, are crucial. In
addition to these measures, the prevention of COVID-19-related complications in people
at moderate to high risk of hospitalization, notably by taking an antiviral, can only be
positive for the healthcare system, provided it is done safely. Without replacing clinical
judgment, the recommendations published in the optimal use guide should consolidate
knowledge and support clinicians in identifying people at significant risk of complications
from COVID-19, as well as promoting the optimal use of treatments. The enhancement
and harmonization of practice will, however, depend on:
• distribution of the optimal use guide;
• adherence to and appropriation of the recommendations by the healthcare
professionals concerned;
• the application of winning conditions to interprofessional work in various care
environments, particularly on the front line
Authors' recommendations:
At the end of the work and the whole iterative process with members of the Advisory
Committee, where scientific data, information, and recommendations drawn from the
reviewed literature, contextual items, and the perspective of various consulted
stakeholders were triangulated, clinical benchmarks and previous recommendations were
either renewed, withdrawn, or modulated, and new information and recommendations
were added. The new features at the heart of this report have also been incorporated into
the new optimal use guide, which replaces the series of clinical tools on specific
treatments produced during the pandemic.
Authors' methods:
For this work, the evaluation questions were formulated to cover the population, clinical,
and organizational dimensions arising from the INESSS Statement of Principles and
Ethical Foundations. In collaboration with a scientific information consultant (librarian), a
systematic search of scientific literature published between March 2020 and March 2023
was conducted in more than three bibliographic databases. A manual search of grey
literature was also conducted in Spring 2023, consulting, among others, the websites of
learned societies specializing in infectious diseases, health technology assessment
agencies, and other organizations that published recommendations on COVID-19 during
the pandemic. A targeted informational search of this literature was conducted until July
2024. Rapid reviews of the scientific literature on the efficacy and safety of various
COVID-19 treatments, conducted by the INESSS between 2020 and 2024, were also
considered. For the rapid review of clinical practice guidelines, document selection,
information extraction, and methodological quality evaluation were conducted
independently by two scientific professionals. Official monographs for drugs approved by
Health Canada were consulted, as were ongoing surveillance reports published by
government agencies. The data and contextual items gathered were analyzed and
synthesized by one professional, then validated by a second. This analysis was
conducted to contextualize the practice in Quebec, based in particular on elements of the
legislative, regulatory, and organizational context specific to the province, and on the
perspective of the various stakeholders consulted. To gather the stakeholders'
perspective, an Advisory Committee was set up, made up of clinicians from various
specialties and areas of expertise. The perspective of experts and specialists who collaborated with the INESSS during the three years of the pandemic (March 2020 to
March 2023) was also taken into consideration. The identification of key clinical
benchmarks and the formulation of recommendations were conducted in collaboration
with members of the Advisory Committee, based in particular on an evaluation of all the
documented evidence. Finally, the overall quality of the work, its acceptability, and
applicability were evaluated by external readers specializing in the field of interest, as
well as future users who were not involved in the work.
Authors' identified further research:
Unless the epidemiological context evolves unfavorably as a result of the arrival of a new
variant that is more virulent or resistant to current antivirals, the relevance of updating the
recommendations will be evaluated four years from the date of publication of this guide,
according to the progress of scientific data and the evolution of clinical practices, and to
any significant changes in complementary contextual documents published by the
Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS) or the Institut national de santé
publique du Québec (INSPQ), or by the health and social services network, or according
to the listing or delisting of drugs.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/publications/repertoire-des-publications/publication/usage-optimal-des-traitements-de-la-covid-19.html
Year Published:
2024
URL for published report:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/publications/repertoire-des-publications/publication/usage-optimal-des-traitements-de-la-covid-19.html
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
Canada
Province:
Quebec
MeSH Terms
- COVID-19
- COVID-19 Drug Treatment
- SARS-CoV-2
- Coronavirus Infections
- Practice Guideline
- Ritonavir
- Antiviral Agents
Contact
Organisation Name:
Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux
Contact Address:
L'Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux (INESSS) , 2021, avenue Union, bureau 10.083, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2S9;Tel: 1+514-873-2563, Fax: 1+514-873-1369
Contact Name:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Contact Email:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Copyright:
Gouvernement du Québec
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.