Cost-effectiveness of bioimpedance-guided fluid management in patients undergoing haemodialysis: the BISTRO RCT
Zanganeh M, Belcher J, Fotheringham J, Coyle D, Lindley EJ, Keane DF, Caskey FJ, Dasgupta I, Davenport A, Farrington K, Mitra S, Ormandy P, Wilkie M, Macdonald JH, Solis-Trapala I, Sim J, Davies SJ, Andronis L
Record ID 32018013279
English
Authors' objectives:
The BioImpedance Spectroscopy to maintain Renal Output randomised controlled trial investigated the effect of bioimpedance spectroscopy added to a standardised fluid management protocol on the risk of anuria and preservation of residual kidney function (primary trial outcomes) in incident haemodialysis patients. Despite the economic burden of kidney disease, the cost-effectiveness of using bioimpedance measurements to guide fluid management in haemodialysis is not known. To assess the cost-effectiveness of bioimpedance-guided fluid management against current fluid management without bioimpedance.
Authors' results and conclusions:
The bioimpedance-guided fluid management group was associated with £382 lower average cost per patient (95% CI −£3319 to £2556) and 0.043 more quality-adjusted life-years (95% CI −0.019 to 0.105) compared with the current fluid management group, with neither values being statistically significant. The probability of bioimpedance-guided fluid management being cost-effective was 76% and 83% at commonly cited willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. The results remained robust to a series of sensitivity analyses. Compared with current fluid management, bioimpedance-guided fluid management produced a marginal reduction in costs and a small improvement in quality-adjusted life-years. Results from both the base-case and sensitivity analyses suggested that use of bioimpedance is likely to be cost-effective.
Authors' methods:
Within-trial economic evaluation (cost–utility analysis) carried out alongside the open-label, multicentre BioImpedance Spectroscopy to maintain Renal Output randomised controlled trial. Thirty-four United Kingdom outpatient haemodialysis centres, both main and satellite units, and their associated inpatient hospitals. Four hundred and thirty-nine adult haemodialysis patients with > 500 ml urine/day or residual glomerular filtration rate > 3 ml/minute/1.73 m2. The primary outcome measure of the BioImpedance Spectroscopy to maintain Renal Output economic evaluation was incremental cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year gained over 24 months following randomisation. In the main (base-case) analysis, this was calculated from the perspective of the National Health Service and Personal Social Services. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of different scenarios, sources of resource use data and value sets. The missing data level was high for some resource use categories collected through case report forms, due to COVID-19 disruptions and a significant dropout rate in the informing BioImpedance Spectroscopy to maintain Renal Output trial.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta/NIHR136142
Year Published:
2024
URL for published report:
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/published-articles/JYPR4287
URL for additional information:
English
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Full HTA
Country:
United Kingdom
DOI:
10.3310/JYPR4287
MeSH Terms
- Dialysis
- Renal Dialysis
- Body Fluids
- Electric Impedance
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- Dielectric Spectroscopy
- Water-Electrolyte Imbalance
Contact
Organisation Name:
NIHR Health and Social Care Delivery Program
Contact Name:
Rhiannon Miller
Contact Email:
rhiannon.m@prepress-projects.co.uk
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.