[Systematic review on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in the treatment of spinal pain of mechanical origin]

Soto-Pedre E, García González LA, De León García FJ, García Bravo AM, Garcés González MM, López Bastida J, Duque González B
Record ID 32018013101
Spanish
Original Title: Revisión sistemática sobre la efectividad y coste-efectividad de los ultrasonidos en el tratamiento del dolor vertebral de origen mecánico
Authors' objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound therapy in the treatment of vertebral pain of mechanical origin.
Authors' results and conclusions: RESULTS: After discarding duplicates, 56 references were selected out of the 477 references that were achieved. After this selection, 11 references (4 systematic reviews and 7 clinical trials) were finally included for data extraction and synthesis. Even though the general quality of the included studies was between level III and level IV on Jovell scale, the quality of the included clinical trials was poor on JADAD scale except for one with adequate quality. No study with an adequate quality was identified for ultrasound therapy as a single intervention for mechanical vertebral pain compared to placebo. The included clinical trials evaluated the effectiveness of one or more of the interventions of interest in combination always with other treatments (manipulation and mobilization of the spine). Any of them did not find statistical significant differences at 6 months after ending the treatment. The only significant differences offered by these studies were reported by a small case serie extracted from a clinical trial. The results from clinical trials are in agreement with those from previous systematic reviews on the effectiveness of several physical therapies to treat neck-back pain of mechanical origin. CONCLUSIONS: The present report suggests that it is not possible to conclude on the effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness of ultrasounds to treat mechanical vertebral pain because the evidence found was either poor or inadequate.
Authors' methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature. The search was conducted on OVID (Medline, Embase, Medline in process and CINHAL) and other databases (Cochrane Library, Centre for Reviews & Disemination, SCI, Current Contents, Indice Médico Español and PEDro). The criteria employed to select the references were the following: population (patients with mechanical vertebral pain), assessed intervention (ultrasounds), standard procedure for comparison (other treatments or placebo), outcomes (effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness) and study design (systematic reviews, clinical trials and observational studies). The studies’ quality assessment was done using the Jovell and Navarro-Rubio scale and the JADAD scale for clinical trials. Data synthesis was qualitative.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2009
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Full HTA
Country: Spain
MeSH Terms
  • Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Ultrasonic Therapy
  • Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Keywords
  • Ultrasonic therapy
  • Spine
  • Humans
  • Effectiveness
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Ultrasonics
  • Ultrasound
  • Vertebral column
Contact
Organisation Name: Canary Health Service
Contact Address: Dirección del Servicio. Servicio Canario de la Salud, Camino Candelaria 44, 1ª planta, 38109 El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife
Contact Name: sescs@sescs.es
Contact Email: sescs@sescs.es
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.