An evaluation of drug eluting (coated) stents for percutaneous coronary interventions: what should their role be at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)?
Brophy J
Record ID 32003001209
English
Authors' objectives:
This report aims to provide guidance on the future use of drug eluting (coated) stents for percutaneous coronary interventions. These new devices are expected to cost approximately five times the price of regular stents and it is imperative to fully assess their safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Authors' recommendations:
Acceptance of a policy of replacing bare metal stents with the new coated versions might avoid the need for a repeat angioplasty for approximately 100 patients per year. It would not prevent any deaths or myocardial infarctions. The net cost to the MUHC of this policy would likely be in the vicinity of 2-3 million CDN dollars per year. Even a policy of restricted use (10-15%) would have a substantial budgetary impact for limited health benefits. The TAU committee believes that in the absence of any fresh budget to meet this demand, the reduction in hospital services that would result from this fresh expenditure would be unjustifiable. TAU therefore recommends:
1. That despite good evidence supporting the efficacy of coated stents to reduce the rate of restenosis, the current budget of the hospital should not be redistributed to permit the routine acquisition of drug eluting stents. Thus in the absence of a specially dedicated provincial budget for this technology, coated stents should not be provided by the MUHC except for special circumstances.
2. The special cases requiring a coated stent should be approved by two members of the Division of Cardiology, ideally two interventional cardiologists.
3. The evidence on which this policy recommendation is based is likely to be very time sensitive. The decision should be frequently reviewed and modified if necessary in the light of such evidence. The responsibility for requesting review can be initiated by either the Division of Cardiology or the Technology Assessment.
Authors' methods:
Systematic review
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
http://www.mcgill.ca/tau/publications/2003
Year Published:
2003
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
Canada
MeSH Terms
- Coronary Restenosis
- Drug Delivery Systems
- Stents
Contact
Organisation Name:
Technology Assessment Unit of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)
Contact Address:
Technology Assessment Unit of the MUHC, 536-5100 Boul. Maisonneuve O, Montreal, H4A 3T2
Contact Name:
eva.suarthana@mcgill.ca
Contact Email:
nisha.almeida@muhc.mcgill.ca
Copyright:
Technology Assessment Unit of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.