Minimal access surgery

Malaysian Health Technology Assessment Unit
Record ID 32003001137
English
Authors' objectives:

The objective of this study is to assess the safety, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery, which includes minimal access surgery in orthopaedics, laporoscopic cholecystectomy, percutenous nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy, laparoscopic herniorraphy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic cystectomy, laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy, laparoscopic appendicectomy and laparoscopy in children.

Authors' recommendations: In orthopedics, from the evidence gathered both Microdiscectomy and thoracoscopic anterior release in Scoliosis are not vastly superior to open discectomy and thoracotomy anterior release respectively. However, it is suggested these newer techniques should be encouraged, with opportunities being offered to individual surgeons who wish to pursue such training. The evidence show significant advantages of laparoscopic surgery over open cholecystectomy, like shorter hospital stay, earlier return to work, and less post operative pain. However, the duration of laparoscopic surgery is longer. Ductal stones are now safely and effectively approached by a single stage laparoscopic technique In the management of staghorn calculi in the kidney, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is recommended, where there is a high success rate with low incidence of complications. Extracorporal short wave lithotripsy and repeat Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy may be used as secondary procedures. Based on the evidence obtained, it is recommended that uroteroscopy be the treatment of choice for the removal of distal, mid and proximal ureteral calculi and. It is also safe and efficacious for children below 10 years and for treatment of stones during pregnancy without using flouroscopy. Ureterosopic ureterotomy can be done safely with minimal morbidity and high long-term patency success rate. Patient with single kidney, ureteral or urothelial tumours could be managed by ureteroscopic ablation of these tumors, thus conserving the kidney. Laparoscopic hernia repair seems promising but it is involves additional cost, requires equipment and retraining of the surgeons. Its long term efficacy and safety remains to be elucidated. As for laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy(LAVH), evidence shows that it is safe and cost effective when vaginal hysterectomy is not suitable, with minimal complications when performed by an experienced laparoscopist, although the operating time is longer, However vaginal hysterectomy is the best procedure and more cost effective than laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The evidence shows that the treatment of choice for cystectomy is laparoscopy, which is safe, effective, with reduced hospital stay and costs to both the patients and hospital. The operation time is comparable to laparotomy and complications are minimal. In the treatment of ectopic pregnancy, most studies concluded that laparoscopic is a safe, and effective procedure. It had advantages over laparotomy in terms of reduced hospitalization, faster recovery, and lower health services costs. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was shown to be a safe and effective alternative to open appendicectomy. However, it involves higher cost. With regards to minimal invasive surgery in children, from the evidence obtained, it was found that laparoscopic orchidopexy is safe and useful for localisation of non-palpable testes. The laparoscopic technique is recommended for bilateral impalpable testes and open inguinal exploration for unilateral impalpable testes. For laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, Nissen Fundoplication, there are studies indicating that they are safe and effective in children. However, numbers in these studies are small, thus there is inadequate evidence to recommend these procedures.
Authors' methods: Systematic review
Details
Project Status: Completed
URL for project: http://www.moh.gov.my/
Year Published: 2003
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Malaysia
MeSH Terms
  • Laparoscopy
Contact
Organisation Name: Malaysian Health Technology Assessment Unit
Contact Address: Health Technology Assessment Unit, Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Level 21, PERKIM Building, Jalan Ipoh, 51200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel: 603 4045 7781, Fax: 603 4045 77 40
Copyright: Malaysian Health Technology Assessment Unit (MHTAU)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.