What is the safety of open (Hasson) technique versus closed (blind Veress needle) technique for laparoscopy?
Record ID 32003000679
This aim of this report was to assess the safety of open versus closed technique for laparoscopy.
Authors' recommendations: - We identified one systematic review and one randomised controlled trial (RCT) that directly compared the Veress needle and Hasson techniques for laparoscopy. - The studies assessed the following outcomes: death, visceral injury, vascular injury, gas embolism, wound infection, time to complete procedure, successful completion of procedure and gallbladder abnormalities. - Both studies concluded that the open laparoscopic technique is safer than the closed technique. - The RCT concluded that the open technique is faster to perform than the closed technique. - The systematic review reported lower incidence of vascular injury for the open technique. the RCT reported lower rates of major complications, and higher rates of wound infection with the open technique. There were no significant differences in death rates, visceral injury, gall bladder abnormalities, or successful completion of procedure. - The RCT lacked blinding and had a small sample size. The systematic review had a narrow search strategy, included only low-level studies, and did not assess the quality of the included studies.
Authors' methods: Review
Project Status: Completed
URL for project: http://www.med.monash.edu.au/healthservices/cce/evidence/
Year Published: 2001
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Organisation Name: Centre for Clinical Effectiveness
Contact Address: Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Block E, Monash Medical Centre, Locked Bag 29, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9594 7505; Fax: +61 3 9594 7552.
Contact Name: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Contact Email: email@example.com.
Copyright: Centre for Clinical Effectiveness (CCE)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.