Computed tomography screening for lung cancer
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
Record ID 32003000542
English
Authors' objectives:
This review aims to assess the available evidence on the effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer.
Authors' recommendations:
With regard to helical CT screening for lung cancer, the ICSI Technology Assessment Committee finds that:
Given the unknown cost of following the high number of false-positive cases, the lack of long-term survival data, and the high morbidity associated with follow-up procedures for a positive CT scan, routine use of CT for screening cannot be recommended.
Helical CT enables the detection of early stage tumors. Although early stage tumors have a higher five-year survival rate, there is no study directly linking helical CT with improved survival. (Conclusion Grade IV)
Screening with chest radiography does not result in decreased mortality. Low-dose helical CT is superior to chest radiography in the rate of detection of lung cancer, especially at an early stage. At present, there is no evidence of a decrease in mortality with CT screening. (Conclusion Grade I)
Low-dose helical CT screening is technically a safe procedure; the risks are related to a false-negative or a false-positive diagnosis.
Authors' methods:
Review
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
http://www.icsi.org/index.asp
Year Published:
2001
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
United States
MeSH Terms
- Mass Screening
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Lung Neoplasms
Contact
Organisation Name:
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
Contact Address:
8009 34th Avenue South, Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN, USA. Tel: +1 952 814 7060; Fax: +1 952 858 9675
Contact Name:
icsi.info@icsi.org
Contact Email:
icsi.info@icsi.org
Copyright:
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.