Surgery for morbid obesity

Nilsen E M
Record ID 32003000502
Norwegian
Authors' objectives:

The objective was to assess the effects of different techniques of surgery for people suffering from morbid obesity. The clinical endpoints were weight loss, impact on comorbidity factors, quality of life, mortality and complications of surgery.

Authors' recommendations: Gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion and duodenal switch gives the greatest weight losses. However, these methods are comprehensive, and biliopancreatic diversion gives serious malabsorptive disorders. In comparison, gastric banding gives lower weight-reduction but fewer short-term complications and reoperations. Surgery should be undertaken only after comprehensive, multidisciplinary assessment. A centre of expertise in the surgical management of obesity should be established including healthcare professionals such as psychologists, physician, a specialist surgeon, a specialist anaesthetist, physiotherapist, endocrinologist and dieticians. People considering surgery to achieve weight reduction should discuss in detail with appropriate healthcare professionals the potential benefits and long-term implications of surgery. This includes associated risks, complications and postoperative mortality.
Authors' methods: Systematic review
Details
Project Status: Completed
URL for project: http://www.nokc.no/
Year Published: 2003
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Norway
MeSH Terms
  • Biliopancreatic Diversion
  • Gastric Bypass
  • Obesity
  • Obesity, Morbid
Contact
Organisation Name: Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Contact Address: Universitetsgata 2, Postbox 7004 St. Olavs plass, NO-0310 Oslo NORWAY. Tel: +47 23 25 50 00; Fax: +47 23 25 50 10;
Contact Name: Berit.Morland@nokc.no, dagny.fredheim@nokc.no
Contact Email: Berit.Morland@nokc.no, dagny.fredheim@nokc.no
Copyright: The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.