Authors' objectives: Antidepressants are commonly prescribed during pregnancy, despite a lack of evidence from randomised trials on the benefits or risks. Some studies have reported associations of antidepressants during pregnancy with adverse offspring neurodevelopment, but whether or not such associations are causal is unclear. To study the associations of antidepressants for depression in pregnancy with outcomes using multiple methods to strengthen causal inference. Depression is common in women of childbearing age and up to one in seven women experience depression during pregnancy. Untreated depression may have serious consequences, such as distress, self-neglect and suicidal behaviour, in affected women and birth complications in their babies. Many women with depression may, therefore, encounter a situation in which they need to decide whether to start or continue an antidepressant during their pregnancy; however, the potential for resulting harm to the neurodevelopment of their offspring is a common concern. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, the information available to guide these decisions is based on observational data, which are subject to confounding. Given that maternal depression may itself lead to adverse outcomes, isolating any effect of antidepressants from the underlying depression is particularly difficult: a problem known as confounding by indication. In the absence of randomised trials, studies designed to emulate such trials and using methods to account for confounding may help triangulate results and strengthen causal inference. This research aimed to simulate two scenarios that could be tested in pregnant women with depression in a hypothetical target randomised controlled trial asking the following research questions: Does the initiation of antidepressants for depression during pregnancy affect maternal service use outcomes and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes? Does the continuation of antidepressant use during pregnancy for depression affect maternal service use outcomes and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes? The data were interrogated using several methods of causal inference, and assessed in relation to dose response, timing of exposure and type of antidepressants according to class and their serotonin-receptor affinity.

Authors' results and conclusions: Data on 80,103 pregnancies were used to study maternal primary care outcomes and were linked to 34,274 children with at least 4-year follow-up for neurodevelopmental outcomes. Women who initiated or continued antidepressants during pregnancy were more likely to have contact with primary and secondary health-care services during and after pregnancy and more likely to be prescribed an antidepressant 2 years following the end of pregnancy than women who did not initiate or continue antidepressants during pregnancy (odds ratioinitiation 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.95 to 2.39; odds ratiocontinuation 2.40, 95% confidence interval 2.27 to 2.53). There was little evidence for any substantial association with autism (odds ratiomultivariableregression 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.35; odds ratiopropensityscore 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.32), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (odds ratiomultivariableregression 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.29; odds ratiopropensityscore 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.25) or intellectual disability (odds ratiomultivariableregression 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.19; odds ratiopropensityscore 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.31) in children of women who continued antidepressants compared with those who discontinued antidepressants. There was inconsistent evidence of an association between initiation of antidepressants in pregnancy and diagnosis of autism in offspring (odds ratiomultivariableregression 1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.78; odds ratiopropensityscore 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.66) but not attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or intellectual disability; however, but results were imprecise owing to smaller numbers. Women prescribed antidepressants during pregnancy had greater service use during and after pregnancy than those not prescribed antidepressants. The evidence against any substantial association with autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or intellectual disability in the children of women who continued compared with those who discontinued antidepressants in pregnancy is reassuring. Potential association of initiation of antidepressants during pregnancy with offspring autism needs further investigation. Initiation versus no initiation of antidepressants for depression in pregnancy: In the women’s cohort, there were 18,978 pregnancies in which women had evidence of depression during the pregnancy or in the preceding 12 months. Antidepressants were initiated in 6177 of these pregnancies. In the mother and child cohort, there were 8478 pregnancies in which women had evidence of depression and, of these, antidepressants were initiated in 2649 pregnancies. Multivariable regression and propensity score-matched estimates suggested that women who had initiated an antidepressant consulted more frequently than women who received no antidepressants with their GPs, for any reason or specifically for depressive symptoms, during or up to 2 years after pregnancy. These women were also more likely to be still prescribed an antidepressant 2 years after the pregnancy end date [odds ratio (OR)multivariableregression 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95 to 2.39; ORpropensityscore 2.06, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.34]. There was some evidence that offspring of mothers who initiated antidepressants had higher odds of being diagnosed with autism in propensity score-matched analyses (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.66) although the CIs for this association in multivariable regression analysis crossed the null [OR 1.23 (0.85–1.78)]. There was no strong evidence for differences in odds of offspring ADHD (ORmultivariableregression 1.48, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.24; ORpropensityscore 1.45, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.42) or intellectual disability (ORmultivariableregression 1.16, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.14; ORpropensityscore 0.75, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.78) with initiation of an antidepressant during pregnancy although CIs were wide. Continuation versus discontinuation of antidepressants: In the pregnant women’s cohort, there were 61,125 pregnancies in which women had a prior prescription of antidepressants for depression and of these 37,278 women continued the antidepressant into their pregnancy while 23,847 discontinued by the start of pregnancy. In the mother and child cohort, there were 25,796 pregnancies in which women had a prior prescription of antidepressants for depression and of these 15,295 women continued the antidepressant into their pregnancy while 10,501 discontinued by the start of pregnancy. There was consistent evidence across the main (multivariable regression and propensity score regression) and additional analyses (treatment-discordant pregnancies analysis) that women who continued antidepressants during pregnancy were more likely to have contact with health-care services at various times during and after pregnancy. These include the number of GP consultations (including consultations for depression, and self-harm), GP referrals for depression, and outpatient contacts and inpatient stays for mental health problems. Women who continued antidepressants in pregnancy were also more likely to continue to be prescribed an antidepressant 2 years following the end of pregnancy (ORmultivariableregression 2.40, 95% CI 2.27 to 2.53; ORpropensityscore 2.37, 95% CI 2.24 to 2.51). There was little evidence in our regression and propensity score analyses that continuation of antidepressants into pregnancy was associated with a higher risk in the offspring of autism (ORmultivariableregression 1.10, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.35; ORpropensityscore 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.32), ADHD (ORmultivariableregression 1.02, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.29; ORpropensityscore 0.97, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.25) or intellectual disability (ORmultivariableregression 0.81, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.19; ORpropensityscore 0.89, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.31) as compared with discontinuing them before pregnancy. Similar results were observed in supplementary analyses including instrumental variable analyses and treatment discordant pregnancies, although these analyses were imprecise due to smaller numbers. Instrumental variable analyses: Using prescriber preference as an instrument, we found little evidence of associations of initiation or continuation of antidepressants and any of the neurodevelopmental outcomes, although statistical power was limited. Depression versus other indications: A higher risk of being prescribed antidepressants 2 years after pregnancy was observed when antidepressants had been initiated/continued for depressive symptoms compared with no initiation/discontinuation of antidepressants. The opposite pattern was observed (i.e., a lower risk of being prescribed antidepressants 2 years after pregnancy) when antidepressants had been initiated/continued for indications other than depression compared with no initiation/discontinuation. Negative control analyses: There was little evidence of an association between prescription of an antidepressant for depression before pregnancy versus no prescriptions; or prescription of antidepressants during pregnancy for depression versus no prescriptions and any of the neurodevelopmental outcomes. Timing of antidepressants: There was no consistent difference between estimates for offspring neurodevelopmental outcomes in relation to timing of initiation of antidepressants during pregnancy. Dose response: There was some evidence for a dose response association between antidepressants prescribed to the mother in pregnancy and offspring odds of autism [ORs with 95% CIs for low, medium, and high dose respectively as compared with no antidepressant prescription: 1.19 (0.96–1.46); 1.67 (1.09–2.55); 1.75 (1.27–2.40)], although the CIs around the estimates overlapped. There was no clear evidence for dose–response association with offspring ADHD or intellectual disability. Type of antidepressant: There was evidence of greater adjusted odds of autism among children whose mothers had been prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04–1.53) or tricyclic antidepressants (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.12–2.24) during pregnancy as compared with no antidepressant prescriptions. There was little evidence of similar associations for offspring ADHD or intellectual disability. Antidepressants grouped by serotonin receptor affinity: The point estimates of offspring odds of all neurodevelopmental outcomes were lower for higher-affinity antidepressants than those for lower-affinity antidepressants (which may often be prescribed for more severe depression) although the CIs for all estimates overlapped. Individual antidepressants: There were variations in the estimates for neurodevelopmental outcomes in relation to individual medications but due to smaller numbers contributing to the analyses, these results should be interpreted with caution. This comprehensive study of pregnant women with depression in a representative sample of UK primary care patients found that women who were initiated or continued antidepressants during pregnancy had greater service use at baseline and continued to need support with additional clinical care during pregnancy and in the 2 years following pregnancy. This was not the case for women prescribed these medications for conditions other than depression. There was consistent evidence against any substantial risk of autism, ADHD or intellectual disability in children of women who continued versus those who discontinued antidepressants during pregnancy. Whether to continue or stop antidepressants in pregnancy is the most common clinical dilemma regarding antidepressant prescribing in pregnancy and these results should reassure women and clinicians. There was weak and inconsistent evidence of potential associations of initiation of antidepressants during pregnancy with offspring autism which were imprecise due to smaller numbers. Further research on larger samples could help understand the robustness and causal meaning of these findings.

Authors' methods: This was an observational cohort design using multiple methods to strengthen causal inference, including multivariable regression, propensity score matching, instrumental variable analysis, negative control exposures, comparison across indications and exposure discordant pregnancies analysis. This took place in UK general practice. Participants were pregnant women with depression. The interventions were initiation of antidepressants in pregnancy compared with no initiation, and continuation of antidepressants in pregnancy compared with discontinuation. The maternal outcome measures were the use of primary care and secondary mental health services during pregnancy, and during four 6-month follow-up periods up to 24 months after pregnancy, and antidepressant prescription status 24 months following pregnancy. The child outcome measures were diagnosis of autism, diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and intellectual disability. UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Several causal-inference analyses lacked precision owing to limited numbers. In addition, adherence to the prescribed treatment was not measured. Design: This was an observational cohort design, with use of multiple methods to strengthen causal inference. Setting and participants: This took place in UK general practice. Participants were UK primary care patients, specifically pregnant women with depression. Data sources: This study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a large ongoing database of anonymised primary care medical records in the UK. The CPRD’s pregnancy register was used to identify the dates and stages of pregnancy, and the CPRD mother–baby link allowed for the linkage of the records of pregnant women with their live born offspring. For consenting CPRD practices in England, the primary care records were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, which include registers for inpatient admissions, outpatient care and accident and emergency (A&E) attendance in England, and with mortality data from the Office for National Statistics and Census small-area socioeconomic data. Eligible patients: The data extract covered dates between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2017. Within this time frame, we identified 344,720 pregnancies in the pregnancy register for which there was evidence of depressive symptoms, or prescription of an antidepressant up to 1 year before or during pregnancy. From this sample, we constructed two cohorts: (1) the pregnant women’s cohort, which contained all pregnancies for which women could be followed up for at least 2 years beyond the pregnancy end date, regardless of the pregnancy outcome or ability to link to the child; (2) the mother and child cohort, which consisted of pregnancies followed up at least until delivery that could be linked with the patient records of the children arising from these pregnancies. The pregnant women’s cohort: The exclusion criteria were (1) records for which the general practice was not yet up to standard, as defined by CPRD (n = 61,704); (2) where the patient had not yet registered with her current general practice 1 year prior to conception (n = 93,638); (3) records suggesting that the woman had transferred out of the general practice while still pregnant (n = 15,627); (4) records with

Project Status: Completed

URL for project: https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta/15/80/19

Year Published: 2023

URL for published report: https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/AQTF4490

URL for additional information: English

English language abstract: An English language summary is available

Publication Type: Full HTA

Country: England, United Kingdom

DOI: 10.3310/AQTF4490

Organisation Name: NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme

Contact Address: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK

Contact Name: journals.library@nihr.ac.uk

Contact Email: journals.library@nihr.ac.uk