Adalimumab for the treatment of adults with non-infectious uveitis

Hui D, Mierzwinski-Urban M, Spry C
Record ID 32018005162
English
Authors' objectives: The purpose of this rapid review is to evaluate recent evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness (including safety), cost-effectiveness, and evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of adalimumab for the treatment of adults with non-infectious uveitis. This report was carried out in series with another report that focuses on adalimumab for the treatment of pediatric populations with non-infectious uveitis.
Authors' results and conclusions: Four systematic reviews (SRs) and 1 economic evaluation were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness (including safety) and cost-effectiveness of adalimumab in adults with non-infectious uveitis. In adults with active non-infectious uveitis (VISUAL I), adalimumab significantly lowered the risk of treatment failure and significantly improved changes in best-corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber cell grade, and vitreous haze grade. Additionally, the number and rate of adverse events and serious adverse events were greater in the adalimumab group compared to the placebo group. Clinical effectiveness and safety findings from the Japanese sub study (VISUAL I Japan) and data from a randomized controlled trial of a younger adult population (ADUR) demonstrated that adalimumab may have no treatment effect. In adults with inactive non-infectious uveitis (VISUAL II), adalimumab significantly lowered risk of treatment failure; however, adalimumab may have no treatment effect on changes in best-corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber cell grade, and vitreous haze grade. Additionally, the number and rate of adverse events and serious adverse events were variable in the adalimumab versus placebo groups (e.g., number of adverse events was greater in the adalimumab group but the rate of adverse events was higher in the placebo groups). Clinical effectiveness and safety findings from the Japanese substudy (VISUAL II Japan) demonstrated that adalimumab may have no treatment effect. Considering both active and inactive non-infectious uveitis (VISUAL I, VISUAL I [Japan], VISUAL II, VISUAL II [Japan], and ADUR), change in vitreous haze grade improved significantly more in the adalimumab group than the control group. In the perspective of the health care system in the UK, adalimumab (plus systemic corticosteroid and immunosuppressant therapy) is not more cost-effective than systemic corticosteroid and immunosuppressant use alone (modelled by placebo data) in adults with active and inactive non-infectious uveitis influencing the posterior segment (i.e., back of the eye). No evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of adalimumab for the treatment of adults with non-infectious uveitis were identified.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2022
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Rapid Review
Country: Canada
Province: Ontario
MeSH Terms
  • Uveitis
  • Adult
  • Adalimumab
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Keywords
  • adalimumab
  • humira
  • unveitis
  • uveitis
Contact
Organisation Name: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Contact Address: 600-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8 Canada. Tel: +1 613 226 2553; Fax: +1 613 226 5392;
Contact Name: requests@cadth.ca
Contact Email: requests@cadth.ca
Copyright: <p>Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)</p>
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.