[State of knowledge: virtual care in pediatrics]
Robitaille H, Attieh R, Brunet J, Cloutier I, Collette C, Coté B, Gagné V, Gilbert S, Turcotte C
Record ID 32018004915
French
Original Title:
État des connaissances - Soins virtuels en pédiatrie
Authors' objectives:
The aging of the population and the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases will
undoubtedly lead to a significant increase in the demand for continuous home and
institutional care, this in the current context of limited professional resources in Québec.
Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a major advance in the use of virtual
care tools to ensure access to care and services and to promote continuity of care. In
addition to information technologies, that are now frequently used, the integration of
virtual care modalities into care pathways is of growing interest for the evaluation,
treatment and follow-up of patients in specialty medicine. These modalities have the
potential to improve access to health care for most patients, but also to foster their
engagement in the management of their illness.
In the context of a national project on virtual care, the Ministère de la Santé et des
Services sociaux (MSSS) has mandated the Institut national d'excellence en santé et en
services sociaux (INESSS) to provide a state-of-knowledge report to guide the use of
virtual care in specialty medicine. This work will help support or optimize care pathways
and support clinical practices and the provision of care and services to patients. The
objective of this work is to inform public decision-makers, medical associations, and
health and social services professionals about virtual care practices in specialty
medicine. The project involves the following seven parts: 1) Pediatrics (this report), 2)
Psychiatry, 3) Neurology, 4) Hematology/Oncology, 5) Respirology, 6) General Surgery
and 7) Internal Medicine.
Authors' results and conclusions:
RESULTS (#1 FINDINGS CONCERNING VIRTUAL CARE IN PEDIATRICS): Most of the virtual care interventions mentioned in the different clinical pathways
involve several modalities, such as teleconsultation, telemonitoring, teleeducation, teleassistance and teleintervention.
• Teleconsultation and tele-education are the modalities most frequently reported
in the reviewed literature.
• Many authors of the selected studies conclude that further studies of good quality
will be necessary. (#2.1 VIRTUAL CARE PATHWAYS REPORTED AS BEING CLINICALLY EFFECTIVE): Assessment or diagnosis, mainly by teleconsultation, for children with the
following clinical conditions:
– Neurodevelopmental disorders, in particular, language disorders, autism
spectrum disorders, attention deficit disorders with/without hyperactivity and
learning disabilities;
– Certain cancers;
– Certain dermatological conditions, in particular, the inflammatory
dermatoses, birthmarks, rashes and acne;
– Acute conditions during emergency or intensive care. (#2.2 VIRTUAL CARE PATHWAYS REPORTED AS HAVING POTENTIAL CLINICAL EFFICACY, WHICH IS TO BE
CONFIRMED BY FUTURE EVIDENCE:
): Evaluation or diagnosis, mainly via teleconsultation and telemonitoring, of
suicidal behaviours in adolescents, particularly in a school setting, urological
conditions and certain dermatological conditions;
• Monitoring, mainly via teleconsultation, telemonitoring and tele-education, of
pediatric patients (adolescents) exhibiting suicidal behaviours, particularly in a
school setting, chronic illnesses (e.g., diabetes and anxiety or depressive
symptoms associated with chronic pain), infectious diseases, or for ongoing
postoperative care after a complex surgical procedure, or for children who have
received an organ transplant; (#2.3 FEW RESULTS CONCERNING ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICACY, BUT CERTAIN BENEFITS REPORTED): Improved postoperative care appointment attendance, mainly through the use of
tele-education;
• Reduced waiting times for children with dermatological conditions through the use
of teledermatology, mainly via teleconsultation;
• Improved communication between health professionals and families of children in
palliative care, mainly through the use of teleconsultation. (#2.4 POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF VIRTUAL CARE REPORTED AS HAVING A POSITIVE IMPACT ON EQUITY OF
ACCESS FOR): Children with chronic illnesses, such as asthma, chronic pain and obesity, and
those with dermatological or urological conditions, mainly via teleconsultation;
• Children with complex needs in underprivileged areas or with particular cultural
backgrounds (e.g., mental health problems or chronic illnesses);
• Children in remote or rural areas;
• Children in palliative care, mainly via teleconsultation;
• Children in a school setting (e.g., language disorders or chronic illnesses), mainly
via teleconsultation. (#2.5 A PROMISING LEVEL OF SATISFACTION): For patients and care providers, overall satisfaction reported across the different
care trajectories is positive, both for assessing or diagnosing various conditions
and for monitoring or treating them, e.g., cognitive impairment, mental illnesses,
suicidal behaviours, neurodevelopmental disorders, chronic diseases, active
cancers, organ transplants, dermatological and urological conditions, and
palliative, postoperative, emergency and intensive care.
(#2.6 PROMISING RESULTS CONCERNING THE SECURITY AND SAFETY OF VIRTUAL CARE): Virtual care is as safe and secure as in-person care;
• Untoward effects and negative experiences are quite rare;
• Very low treatment drop-out rates, no worsening of symptoms or medical
condition, no complications, and fewer patients who do not continue their followup or who refuse treatment with virtual care. (#2.7 CERTAIN OTHER CLINICAL ACTIVITIES COULD BENEFIT FROM VIRTUAL CARE): Data from guidelines and guidance documents point to clinical activities that could
be supported by virtual care, such as:
– The assessment of sexual health and of congenital heart disease, genetic
abnormalities or retinopathy in preterm infants;
– The analysis of laboratory, imaging or specialist reports; Liaison between community and rural nurseries and neonatal and perinatal
care specialists;
– Assistance to emergency departments in assessing serious illnesses;
– Telepsychiatry for adolescents;
– Pediatric telecardiology;
– Drug therapy dispensing, in particular, in schools, mental health facilities,
daycare centres, outpatient clinics and justice facilities;
– Pediatric surgery, including pre- and postoperative visits and teleassistance
during surgery;
– Community-based intensive care.
– The management of various chronic gastroenterological diseases;
– Pediatric neurological management, e.g., telemedicine outpatient visits,
community hospitals and home care. (#2.8 PRACTICES THAT COULD POTENTIATE THE EFFICACY OF VIRTUAL CARE): Evidence from practice guidelines and systematic reviews suggests that the
efficacy of virtual care interventions in the pediatric population could be
potentiated by:
– Assistance for parents in virtual care interventions, especially for children
with mental health problems, autism or obesity;
– Assistance or guidance from health professionals or therapists to support
children during virtual care interventions for monitoring or therapeutic
support purposes;
– Nurse assistance to support the remote examination when assessing
children with mental health problems and/or a chronic illness;
– Combining virtual care with in-person care;
– Combining several virtual care modalities LIMITATIONS OF SCOPING REVIEW: This report is limited by the following methodological constraints: the type of documents
selected, the literature review period of 5 years, the independent study selection for only
10% of the studies, the absence of a formal assessment of the quality of evidence, and
the descriptive data synthesis with no meta-analysis.
Most of the selected systematic reviews aggregate or select, without distinction, data
from primary studies conducted in various care settings with different comparators,
clinical situations, and technologies. For meta-analyses, the heterogeneity of the studies
and interventions, the small number of studies compared and/or the small number of
participants, and the poor quality of the studies are often listed in the limitations. In addition, cultural sensitivity or cultural adaptation and collaborative care, which are topics
that should not be overlooked for equity in virtual care, were very rarely addressed.
Lastly, limitations pertaining to the study populations and the various measures in the
studies also need to be taken into consideration.
The field of pediatrics is a clinical specialty encompassing many subspecialties. The
literature search therefore yielded very heterogeneous results. Consequently, certain
specific care pathways, which could benefit from virtual care modalities, may not have
been reported in the reviewed literature. CONCLUSION: Regarding the use of virtual care in pediatrics, the most studied care pathways in the
literature on the use of virtual care concern various chronic illnesses.
Teleconsultation is the most frequently used virtual care modality in the care pathways
studied. However, the reviewed literature reports the simultaneous use of several virtual
care modalities. In any event, the modalities are used alone or in combination with other
modalities, and virtual care can be used in place of or in addition to standard care.
Authors' methods:
A scoping review was conducted to portray the care pathways that might be supported or
optimized with the use of virtual care. A review of the scientific and grey literature was
carried out for the past 5 years. The existing national and international guidelines,
guidance documents and discussion papers, and health technology assessment (HTA)
reports published on the topic were also consulted to identify additional pathways or to
confirm those identified in the systematic reviews. Documents were selected according to
predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These steps were carried out by one
reviewer, and 10% of the titles and abstracts evaluated were independently re-evaluated
by a second reviewer. The data extraction from the selected documents was carried out
by a reviewer. The extracted data were analyzed and presented in the form of a narrative
synthesis for each care pathway identified. Given the rapid nature of the work and the
type of review conducted, the methodological quality of the selected documents was not
assessed. In addition, the consistency of the study results, the number of studies and
their perceived quality, the biases raised, and the statistical analyses of the metaanalyses were taken into account when drawing up the findings concerning care pathways and virtual care modalities that support or optimize clinical practices in
specialty medicine.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/Rapports/OrganisationsSoins/INESSS_Soins_virtuels_Pediatrie_EC.pdf
Year Published:
2023
URL for published report:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/Rapports/OrganisationsSoins/INESSS_Soins_virtuels_Pediatrie_EC.pdf
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
Canada
Province:
Quebec
MeSH Terms
- Pediatrics
- Child Health Services
- Adolescent Health Services
- Delivery of Health Care
- Telemedicine
- Remote Consultation
- Internet
- Mobile Applications
- Smartphone
Contact
Organisation Name:
Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux
Contact Address:
L'Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux (INESSS) , 2021, avenue Union, bureau 10.083, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2S9;Tel: 1+514-873-2563, Fax: 1+514-873-1369
Contact Name:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Contact Email:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Copyright:
L'Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux (INESSS)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.