[Guidelines and standards: optimal use of immunoglobulin in solid organ transplantation]
Magron A, Lefebvre J
Record ID 32018002337
French
Original Title:
Guides et normes: usage optimal des immunoglobulines en transplantation d’organes solides
Authors' objectives:
Nonspecific human immunoglobulins (Igs) are stable products derived from human
plasma. Their cost is high, their supply variable, and their use in Québec has been
steadily increasing for many years in a number of areas of medicine, including solid
organ transplantation. The framework for the use of nonspecific human immunoglobulins
is therefore one of the concerns of Québec’s Comité consultatif national de médecine
transfusionnelle, which has called attention to the lack of recommendations concerning
their use for most solid organ transplantation indications.
At the suggestion of the Comité consultatif national de médecine transfusionnelle, the
Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux asked the Institut national d'excellence en
santé et en services sociaux to develop clinical recommendations concerning the use of
nonspecific human immunoglobulins in solid organ transplantation, in the form of an
optimal use guide. At the completion of this project, INESSS had developed clinical
recommendations for the optimal use of nonspecific human intravenous immunoglobulin
(IVIg) in solid organ transplantation to prevent or treat eight different infections and to
prevent or treat transplant rejection in pediatric or adult solid organ transplant recipients
(kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas or small intestine).
Authors' results and conclusions:
RESULTS: The systematic literature review indicates, with a level of evidence considered moderate
to low, that IVIg is ineffective in preventing transplant rejection in solid organ transplant
recipients. However, the clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of IVIg to prevent
transplant rejection in transplant recipients in specific situations. The advisory
committee’s members also indicated that IVIg could be considered a treatment option for
preventing transplant rejection in hyperimmunized individuals or in cases of HLA- or
ABO-incompatible transplants. In the case of liver transplantation, the committee
members also indicated that IVIg could be considered a treatment option to prevent
transplant rejection in HLA- or ABO-incompatible transplant recipients. However, there is
insufficient data regarding the prevention of transplant rejection in hyperimmunized
individuals who have received a liver transplant.
The data from the systematic reviews indicate that IVIg is only marginally effective or
ineffective for four indications: the prevention of Epstein-Barr virus infections (low level of
evidence), the treatment of norovirus infections (low level of evidence), and the
prevention and the treatment of polyomavirus BK infections (moderate to low level of
evidence). In addition, the systematic literature reviews did not yield any primary studies
and have an insufficient level of evidence to draw any conclusions regarding the
treatment of Epstein-Barr virus infections or the prevention of norovirus infections. The
clinical practice guideline recommendations and the clinician perspective are consistent
in not recommending the use of IVIg to prevent Epstein-Barr virus, norovirus or BK
polyomavirus infections, or to treat Epstein-Barr virus or norovirus infections.
Nevertheless, the experts consulted indicated that IVIg may be considered a treatment
option for treating confirmed polyomavirus BK nephropathy in solid organ transplant
recipients, particularly if concurrent transplant rejection is suspected in a kidney
transplant recipient. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the efficacy data of Igs was available for a minority of the indications of
interest, and the level of evidence was considered low or insufficient for 17 of these
18 indications.
An assessment of the scientific and contextual data and the clinician perspective led to
the following conclusions:
• the Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux recommends
that IVIg be considered a treatment option, a second-line treatment or, in specific
situations, for the treatment of transplant rejection or the prevention of transplant
rejection under specific conditions of use in solid organ transplant recipients, and
for the treatment of parvovirus B19 or polyomavirus BK infections in solid organ
transplant recipients;
• the Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux does not
recommend the use of IVIg to prevent Epstein-Barr virus, norovirus, HHV-6,
parvovirus B19, polyomavirus BK, adenovirus, or West Nile virus infections or to
treat of Epstein-Barr virus, norovirus or HHV-6 infections in solid organ transplant
recipients.
Authors' recommendations:
Because of insufficient data, the Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services
sociaux could not make recommendations concerning the use of IVIg to prevent
transplant rejection in hyperimmunized individuals who have received a liver transplant,
to treat chronic humoral rejection in solid organ transplant recipients, to prevent
respiratory syncytial virus infections or to treat respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus or
West Nile virus infections in solid organ transplant recipients.
The use of IVIg may be associated with transfusion reactions, which are usually not
serious. Serious transfusion reactions, which are rare, have, however, been reported.
In conclusion, the recommendations in the optimal use guide on nonspecific human
immunoglobulins in solid organ transplantation are in addition to those in the previous
guides for neurology, hematology, clinical immunology, dermatology, rheumatology, and
infectious diseases, which are intended to reduce the inappropriate use of this resource.
Authors' methods:
In response to the mandate from the Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, the
Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux used a collaborative
approach known as “knowledge mobilization”. This approach consists of analyzing and
assessing scientific and contextual data as well as the perspectives of clinicians. (1. Scientific data) - To assess the efficacy and safety of Igs in children and adults for each of the selected
solid organ transplantation indications, we conducted a systematic review for each one in
several bibliographic databases from the date of their inception to June 2021 to identify
all the primary studies and systematic reviews with a meta-analysis published on the
subject. The official product monographs for Health Canada-approved Igs, Health
Canada and U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisories, and a transfusion accident
and incident report published by the Institut national de santé publique du Québec were
consulted to complete the search concerning safety. (2. Contextual data and the clinician perspective) -The number of persons treated and the quantity (expressed in grams) of Igs administered
in Québec in 2018 and 2019 were documented from a report on their use prepared by the
Institut national de santé publique du Québec using information extracted from the
TraceLine™ system database. Health Canada’s website was consulted to check the
approval status of IVIg. (3. Process of constructing recommendations) - The analysis and synthesis of the scientific and contextual data as well as the clinician
perspective enabled structuring of the arguments leading to the formulation of the
recommendations. Only those recommendations for which there was a consensus among
the experts were retained. The solid organ transplantation indications for preventing or
treating eight different infections and for preventing or treating transplant rejection in
pediatric or adult solid organ transplant recipients (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas or
small intestine) were divided into four use categories: IVIg recommended, IVIg a possible
treatment option, IVIg not recommended, and insufficient data.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/en/publications/publications/publication/usage-optimal-des-immunoglobulines-en-transplantation-dorganes-solides.html
Year Published:
2022
URL for published report:
https://www.inesss.qc.ca/en/publications/publications/publication/usage-optimal-des-immunoglobulines-en-transplantation-dorganes-solides.html
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Other
Country:
Canada
Province:
Quebec
MeSH Terms
- Organ Transplantation
- Immunoglobulins, Intravenous
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Graft Rejection
Contact
Organisation Name:
Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux
Contact Address:
L'Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux (INESSS) , 2021, avenue Union, bureau 10.083, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2S9;Tel: 1+514-873-2563, Fax: 1+514-873-1369
Contact Name:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Contact Email:
demande@inesss.qc.ca
Copyright:
Gouvernement du Québec
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.