Leadless Pacemaker
Kessels, S, Parsons, J, Ellery, B
            Record ID 32018000695
            English
                                                
                Authors' results and conclusions:
                Evidence for the safety and effectiveness of leadless pacemakers is limited. Only one small study in humans has been finalised and the other trials assessing procedural and safety outcomes in patients indicated for single chamber ventricular pacing are still ongoing. It is not known if there are differences in effectiveness and safety when comparing the two devices (Nanostim and Micra). Data on the long term effectiveness and risk of complications, e.g. spontaneous dislodgement and embolisation, is lacking and should be investigated.
            
                                    
                Authors' recommendations:
                HealthPACT noted that this technology as the potential to reduce side effects and adverse events compared to pacemakers currently in use. Leadless pacemakers are, however, significantly more expensive in comparison to conventional single chamber pacemakers ($16,000 vs $6,000), which may limit their potential diffusion and uptake in clinical practice in Australia and New Zealand. HealthPACT does not support investment in this technology in clinical practice at this time; however, it is recommended that the evidence be reviewed again in 24 months.
            
                                    
            Details
                        
                Project Status:
                Completed
            
                                                            
                Year Published:
                2015
            
                                    
                URL for published report:
                Not Available
            
                                                            
                English language abstract:
                An English language summary is available
            
                                    
                Publication Type:
                Not Assigned
            
                                    
                Country:
                Australia
            
                                                
                        MeSH Terms
            - Pacemaker, Artificial
- Equipment Design
- Prostheses and Implants
Contact
                        
                Organisation Name:
                Adelaide Health Technology Assessment
            
            
                        
                Contact Address:
                School of Public Health, Mail Drop 545, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, AUSTRALIA, Tel: +61 8 8313 4617
            
                                    
                Contact Name:
                ahta@adelaide.edu.au
            
                                    
                Contact Email:
                ahta@adelaide.edu.au
            
                                    
                Copyright:
                Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA)
            
                    
                This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.