Glasgow Coma Scale for field triage of trauma: a systematic review

Chou R, Totten AM, Pappas M, Carney N, Dandy S, Grusing S, Fu R, Wasson N, Newgard C
Record ID 32017000243
English
Authors' objectives: To assess the predictive utility, reliability, and ease of use of the total Glasgow Coma Scale (tGCS) versus the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS) for field triage of trauma, and effects on clinical decisionmaking and clinical outcomes.
Authors' recommendations: The tGCS is associated with slightly greater discrimination than the mGCS or SMS for in-hospital mortality, receipt of neurosurgical interventions, severe brain injury, and emergency intubation. The clinical significance of small differences in discrimination is likely to be small and could be offset by factors such as convenience and ease of use. Research is needed to understand how use of the tGCS versus the mGCS or SMS impacts clinical outcomes and risk of over- or under-triage.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2017
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: United States
MeSH Terms
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Glasgow Coma Scale
  • Trauma Severity Indices
  • Triage
Contact
Organisation Name: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Contact Address: Center for Outcomes and Evidence Technology Assessment Program, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Tel: +1 301 427 1610; Fax: +1 301 427 1639;
Contact Name: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Contact Email: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Copyright: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.