Patient Experience And Reflective Learning (PEARL)

Bion J, Brookes O, Brown C, Tarrant C, Archer J, Buckley D, Buckley L, Clement I, Evison F, Smith F G, Gibbins C, Hayton E, Jones J, Lilford R, Mullhi R, Packer G, Perkins G D, Shelton J, Snelson C, Sullivan P, Vlaev I, Wolstenholme D, Wright S
Record ID 32016001075
Authors' objectives: The Mid-Staffordshire Hospital report demonstrated that failure of compassion in care is a consequence of the dangerous combination of individual denial of responsibility within an inhibited system. Many of the failings of Mid Staffs may therefore be interpreted as a consequence of interactions between practitioner attitudes and behaviours on the one hand, and resources and structures on the other. These types of attitudes and behaviours are common enough in everyday social interactions, but become lethal within high-risk environments when there is a power imbalance between participants. The aviation industry recognised this many years ago and focused the entire workforce on safety; flattening working hierarchies, standardising practice and using the principles of crew resource management . However, in the healthcare setting, evidence that non-technical skills training having a durable impact is not dependable. There are several challenges to training in non-technical skills: underlying attitudes are often obscure; the training environment is often artificial; the opportunity for reflection is greatly limited; the impact fading quickly; and the practitioner is not directly harmed by any error. Our research proposal focuses on the implementation of reflective learning; a central component of educational theory and practice. We define reflective learning in our proposal as an experiential process of personal insight development or more simply, it is the process of internally examining and exploring an issue of concern that is triggered by an experience, which in turn creates and clarifies meaning and results in a changed conceptual perspective. Our overall aim is to develop a theory-based framework to promote reflective learning which links patient experience as directly and immediately as possible, to both a group and an individual performance. Through the use of questionnaires, interviews and observations we will develop an understanding of how patients, relatives and staff understand the experience of travelling through the health system, how quality is perceived, and how attitudes and behaviours affect the overall patient experience. We will characterise individual and organisational barriers and facilitators of good practice. Building on existing quality control processes in hospitals, we will organise information on the patient experience in a form that can be easily understood. This information will be fed back to clinicians during organised quality improvement meetings where they will be mentored in the art of reflective practice so that, rather than being defensive, staff incorporate the ideas of self-criticism and continual improvement into their normal working lives. We will develop this into a framework of workplace-based reflective learning tools and processes with potential for incorporation in national training programmes. In short, and more importantly, we shall develop and pilot a tool for culture change ; applying those so valuable lessons from the Francis Report outcome. We will locate this project in the acute medical and intensive care units of three hospitals for the very reason that these are high-risk environments in which vulnerable emergency patients benefit from multidisciplinary team (MDT) based care requiring a high level of integrated team working. The project builds on our previous successful patient experience work.
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2020
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: England
MeSH Terms
  • Patient Safety
  • Clinical Competence
  • Learning
  • Patient Participation
  • Empathy
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Education, Professional
  • Professional Competence
  • Staff Development
Organisation Name: NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme
Contact Address: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name:
Contact Email:
Copyright: Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.