Epi proColon (Epigenomics Inc.)

HAYES, Inc.
Record ID 32016000949
English
Authors' recommendations: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the United States. It is estimated that approximately 134,000 individuals will be diagnosed with CRC in 2016, and approximately 49,000 people will die from the disease. It is established that screening for CRC allows for the early detection and removal of cancers or precancerous polyps, resulting in improved overall survival. However, since not all polyps have the potential for malignancy, appropriate management of some types of polyps is controversial. There are multiple screening approaches that may include colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and/or a high-sensitivity fecal occult blood test (FOBT). However, it is estimated that approximately half of Americans >= 50 years old do not adhere to the current screening recommendations. Because of poor compliance, recent studies have focused on the development of screening tools that may be considered more acceptable to eligible individuals who are not being screened. One recently developed blood based screening test capitalizes on the fact that epigenetic changes contribute to the pathogenesis of CRC. The focus of this report is on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved Epi proColon test which is a blood-based methylation SEPT9 assay.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2016
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: United States
MeSH Terms
  • Humans
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Mass Screening
  • Polyps
  • Occult Blood
Contact
Organisation Name: HAYES, Inc.
Contact Address: 157 S. Broad Street, Suite 200, Lansdale, PA 19446, USA. Tel: 215 855 0615; Fax: 215 855 5218
Contact Name: saleinfo@hayesinc.com
Contact Email: saleinfo@hayesinc.com
Copyright: 2014 Winifred S. Hayes, Inc
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.