Autologous breast reconstruction techniques after mammary resection time measurements for a potential re-evaluation of the surgeon fee

Gerkens S, Van De Sande S, Leroy R, Mertens A-S, Schreiber J, Van Halewyck D, Bellaert J, Van Brabandt H, Swartenbroekx N, Obyn C
Record ID 32015001105
English
Authors' recommendations: It should be noted that the aim of this study was not to analyze the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of autologous breast reconstruction interventions compared to alternatives as it is usually done in classical health technology assessments (HTA). The clinical part on the effectiveness and safety of these procedures compared to alternatives as well as the description of the current practice in Belgium (including some cost data) were rather presented to set the frame of the medical context around autologous breast reconstruction. As stated above, the scope of this report was not to put in question the reimbursement decision of autologous breast reconstruction techniques but rather to provide objective data for potential re-evaluations of the current reimbursement tariffs. This is also why the cost study was limited to the "surgeon cost" for the initial breast reconstruction episode, also without taking into account long-term complications. Important variations were found in the results, also depending of methodological choices. For unilateral DIEP interventions for example, results ranged from € 1125 (which is below the current RIZIV-INAMI fee of € 1527) to € 2344 depending on the scenario. This amount further increases when taking into account start and stop activities (up to € 2584) or by adding secondary interventions (i.e. immediate or delayed adjustments). Due to the long list of limitations described above, the current analysis must be used with caution and can only serve for a temporary revision of the fees for autologous breast reconstruction techniques with flap, awaiting a more global re-evaluation across and within medical specialties. The big challenge in the future will be to define what would be a fair and reasonable base hourly income for a physician.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2015
URL for published report: https://doi.org/10.57598/R251C
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Belgium
MeSH Terms
  • Humans
  • Breast
  • Mammaplasty
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures
  • Fees and Charges
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Hospital Costs
  • Reimbursement Mechanisms
  • Surgical Flaps
  • Operative Time
Contact
Organisation Name: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre
Contact Address: Administrative Centre Botanique, Doorbuilding (10th floor), Boulevard du Jardin Botanique 55, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium tel: +32 2 287 33 88 fax: +32 2 287 33 85
Contact Name: info@kce.fgov.be
Contact Email: info@kce.fgov.be
Copyright: <p>Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE)</p>
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.