Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of usual care versus specialist integrated care: a comparative study of hospital discharge arrangements for homeless people in England
Record ID 32015001002
English
Authors' objectives:
This study will explore the special services that have been set-up to improve homeless people s experiences of leaving hospital. It will investigate four different types of specialist service. Some services might for example, put patients in touch with a GP who is specially trained to work with homeless people and who will start to work with them while they are still in hospital. Other schemes might employ a housing support worker to make sure homeless people do not return to living on the streets after being in hospital. We want to know what homeless people think of these specialist services and how they help them to tackle the full range of problems they might have. We also want to know if this specialist support prevents homeless people from having to go back into hospital. To see how well these schemes are working and how much they cost we will also study hospital discharge in two hospitals where there is no specialist support for homeless people.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hsdr/1315610
Year Published:
2015
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
England, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- England
- Patient Discharge
- Specialization
Contact
Organisation Name:
NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme
Contact Address:
NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Copyright:
Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.