ARTISTIC: a randomised trial of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in primary cervical screening
Kitchener HC, Almonte M, Gilham C, Dowie R, Stoykova B, Sargent A, Roberts C, Desai M, Peto J
Record ID 32002000187
English
Authors' recommendations:
This study found that it would not be either effective or cost-effective to screen with cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) combined when compared with liquid-based cytology alone. HPV testing, either as triage or as initial test triaged by cytology, would be cheaper than cytology without HPV testing
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
http://www.hta.ac.uk/1162
Year Published:
2009
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
England, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
- Adult
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Female
- Middle Aged
- Primary Health Care
- State Medicine
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Young Adult
- Neoplasm Staging
- Papillomaviridae
- Papillomavirus Infections
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Vaginal Smears
Contact
Organisation Name:
NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
Contact Address:
NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email:
journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Copyright:
2009 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.