Opportunities and strategies to drive appropriate use of MRI in Austria
Kisser A, Mayer J, Wild C
            Record ID 32015000386
            English
                                    
                Authors' objectives:
                Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential component of medical care: it plays a vital role not only in diagnosis of diseases and injuries, but also in the monitoring of disease progression and treatment success. Currently, however, the appropriateness of diagnostic imaging is increasingly debated. In a recent publication of 26 low-value medical procedures, 12 involved medical imaging among several categories: diagnostic, preventive and preoperative testing [1]. With more than 100 MRI exams yearly per 1,000 population, Austria is leading in MRI utilisation in comparison to other OECD countries. A useful investigation is one in which the result – positive or negative – will contribute to diagnosis and will alter patient management. Inappropriate use may lead to costs without increasing diagnostic yields: not only the cost of the exams itself, but also ensuing treatment or follow-up costs, increase in waiting times and additional costs if patients are on sick leave [2]. Our aim was therefore to identify recommendations against the use of MRI and interventions to decrease inappropriate imaging relevant to the Austrian context.
            
                                                
                Authors' recommendations:
                The Austrian referral guidelines are widely accepted – we would advocate for an elaboration of these guidelines to allow referrers to better differentiate appropriate and inappropriate indications. Referrers should receive training and tools to consult patients on risks of inappropriate imaging. Radiologists
should be more involved in decision making: as a minimum through consulting service lines or by integration of their expertise in alternative pre-authorisation models.
            
                                    
            Details
                        
                Project Status:
                Completed
            
                                                            
                Year Published:
                2014
            
                                    
                URL for published report:
                http://eprints.hta.lbg.ac.at/1043/1/HTA-Projektbericht_Nr.80.pdf
            
                                                            
                English language abstract:
                An English language summary is available
            
                                    
                Publication Type:
                Not Assigned
            
                                    
                Country:
                Austria
            
                                                
                        MeSH Terms
            - Humans
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Referral and Consultation
- General Practice
- Time Factors
- Health Services Accessibility
- Data Interpretation, Statistical
- Austria
Contact
                        
                Organisation Name:
                Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment
            
            
                        
                Contact Address:
                Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for fuer Health Technology Assessment (LBI-HTA), Garnisongasse 7/rechte Stiege Mezzanin (Top 20), 1090 Vienna, Austria. Tel: +43 1 236 8119 - 0 Fax: +43 1 236 8119 - 99
            
                                    
                Contact Name:
                tarquin.mittermayr@aihta.at
            
                                    
                Contact Email:
                office@aihta.at
            
                                    
                Copyright:
                Ludwig Boltzmann Institut fuer Health Technology Assessment (LBI-HTA)
            
                    
                This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.