Criteria for the appropriate use of positron emission tomography with FDG (FDG-PET) in head and neck cancer

Ballini L, Vignatelli L, Maltoni S
Record ID 32014001419
English
Authors' recommendations: Aim: The criteria reported in this document are to be intended as guidance for programs of clinical governance aimed at: supporting clinicians on the use of FDG-PET; post hoc analyses of appropriate use of FDG-PET; contributing to the planning of the regional health service. Method: A panel of 26 experts, comprising methodologists, nuclear physicians, radiologists, radiotherapists, surgeons, oncologists, ENT specialists, hematologists and health directors working in Health Trusts and Teaching Hospitals of Emilia-Romagna was convened to discuss and agree on the methodology for a research program aimed at defining the criteria for appropriate use of FDG-PET in oncology. For each indication a systematic review was performed. The GRADE approach was applied to assess the quality of included studies, the level of confidence in the overall evidence for each outcome of interest. The GRADE approach for diagnostic recommendations was also used to elicit judgement from the panel members on benefit and harms trade-off for patient-important outcomes. The RAND method was used to vote and reach an agreement on the appropriateness criteria. Results: The panel examined and assessed the role of FDG-PET for the following 9 clinical indications (diagnosis of head and neck cancer; detection of unknown primary head and neck cancer in patients with metastatic cervical lymph nodes; N staging; M staging and detection of synchronous second primary tumor in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer; target volume definition of curative radiation treatment; evaluation of early response to neo-adjuvant/induction therapy; evaluation of response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy at the end of treatment; follow up of patients with no suspicion of recurrence; diagnosis and staging of suspect distant recurrence. One hundred and one studies were included. Recommendations: Criteria for appropriate use of FDG-PET in head and neck cancer: diagnosis of head and neck cancer - Inappropriate for lack of diagnostic role of FDG-PET ; detection of unknown primary head and neck cancer in patients with metastatic cervical lymph nodes - Appropriate (level of evidence: moderate); N staging of patients with head and neck cancer - Appropriate (level of evidence: moderate); M staging and detection of synchronous second primary tumor in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer - Appropriate (level of evidence: moderate) ; target volume definition of curative radiation treatment - Uncertain (level of evidence: very low); evaluation of early response to neo-adjuvant/induction therapy - Indeterminate for lack of studies; evaluation of response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy at the end of treatment - Uncertain (level of evidence: low); follow up in patients with no suspicion of recurrence - Inappropriate (level of evidence: low) ; diagnosis and staging of suspect distant recurrence - Appropriate (level of evidence: moderate).
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2012
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Italy
MeSH Terms
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms
Contact
Organisation Name: Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale (Regional Agency for Health and Social Care)
Contact Address: Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127 Bologna, Italia tel. +39 051 5277177 fax +39 051 5277049
Contact Name: Ballini_Lu@regione.emilia-romagna.it
Contact Email: Ballini_Lu@regione.emilia-romagna.it
Copyright: Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale, Regione Emilia-Romagna
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.