Informing the development of NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) quality standards through secondary analysis of qualitative narrative interviews on patients' experiences
Ziebland S, Locock L, Fitzpatrick R, Stokes T, Robert G, O'Flynn N, Bennert K, Ryan S, Thomas V, Martin A
            Record ID 32014001416
            English
                                    
                Authors' objectives:
                (1) To conduct qualitative secondary analysis (of collections of narrative interviews) to identify common, core components of patients' experiences of the NHS. (2) To test these candidate components with (i) further purposive sampling of the interview collections and (ii) a series of focus groups with users. (3) To embed the project alongside the development of NICE clinical guidelines and quality standards. (4) To inform the development of measurement tools on patients' experiences. (5) To develop and share resources and skills for secondary analysis of qualitative health research.
            
                                                
                Authors' recommendations:
                We compared the perspectives about what is most valued in health care between people with different health conditions. They were in agreement, even though their experiences of health-care relationships varied enormously. With regard to the NICE clinical guideline and quality standard development process, the usual source of evidence is published qualitative or quantitative research. Unpublished secondary analysis of qualitative data did not fit the usual criteria for evidence. We suggest that targeted secondary analysis of qualitative data has more potential when the qualitative literature is sparse, unclear or contradictory. Further work might include further testing of the identified core components in other patient groups and health conditions, and collaboration with NICE technical teams to establish whether or not it is possible to identify areas of patient experience research where targeted secondary analyses have potential to add to a qualitative literature synthesis.
            
                                    
            Details
                        
                Project Status:
                Completed
            
                                                            
                Year Published:
                2014
            
                                    
                URL for published report:
                http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/hsdr02450/#/abstract
            
                                                            
                English language abstract:
                An English language summary is available
            
                                    
                Publication Type:
                Not Assigned
            
                                    
                Country:
                England, United Kingdom
            
                                                
                        MeSH Terms
            - Qualitative Research
- Patient Satisfaction
- Quality Control
Contact
                        
                Organisation Name:
                NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme
            
            
                        
                Contact Address:
                NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
            
                                    
                Contact Name:
                journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
            
                                    
                Contact Email:
                journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
            
                                    
                Copyright:
                Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO
            
                    
                This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.