Innovative medical devices for diabetes management
Maltoni S, Negro A, Trimaglio F, Vignatelli L, Ballini L
Record ID 32014001390
English
Authors' recommendations:
International guidelines and HTA reports agree upon the lack of robust evidence supporting the use of CSII pumps, of CGM devices and of semi-integrated systems. They agree upon advising a limited use and restricted to most suitable patients, which should be identified through explicit and shared criteria. Results form the most recent and good quality systematic review of randomised controlled trials highlight that studies have small numbers of patients, a short duration (maximum 52 weeks), evaluate only short-term clinical outcomes (glycaemic control, hypoglycaemic episodes, body parameters, quality of life) and no clinical outcomes related to micro- or macrovascular complications.
Concerning CSII pumps, the available evidence shows a slight difference in HbA1c levels - considered not significant from a clinical point of view - and in global quality of life for type 1 adults diabetic patients, while no difference both in glycaemic parameters and in QOL is shown in paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes and in adult patients with type 2 diabetes. Data on CGM devices, drawn from studies on mixed population of patients with type 1 diabetes, children/adolescents and adults, with a short period of observation, show a
statistically significant difference - that, however, was judged as clinically not significant – in glycaemic parameters (HbA1c, time in hyperglycaemia) in favour of CGM versus SMBG. Evidence in patients with type 2 diabetes are lacking. Finally, data from 4 studies show that, during a short observation time, there is a statistically - and clinically - significant difference of HbA1c and time spent in hyperglycaemia in favour of SAP in mixed populations of paediatric and adult patients with type 1 diabetes. Evidence on the use of SAP in type 2 diabetic patients is absent. Ongoing studies are numerous, some of them enrolling large numbers of patients. However the majority of ongoing studies are of a short duration and consider only surrogate outcomes. The presumed clinical impact on long-term micro- and macrovascular outcomes of innovative devices for diabetes is not confirmed by presently available data. Moreover, no shared criteria to identify patients who could benefit most from these devices are available.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
Year Published:
2012
URL for published report:
http://assr.regione.emilia-romagna.it/it/servizi/pubblicazioni/short-report/SR6_diabete_en
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
Italy
MeSH Terms
- Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Insulin Infusion Systems
Contact
Organisation Name:
Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale (Regional Agency for Health and Social Care)
Contact Address:
Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127 Bologna, Italia tel. +39 051 5277177 fax +39 051 5277049
Contact Name:
Ballini_Lu@regione.emilia-romagna.it
Contact Email:
Ballini_Lu@regione.emilia-romagna.it
Copyright:
Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale, Regione Emilia-Romagna
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.