[A study on the system and execution model for health technology reassessment]
Lee SH, Ji SM, Lee S, Lee M, Cho M, Park JJ, Kwak SJ, Seo HJ, Lee DH
Record ID 32014001099
Korean
Authors' recommendations:
Health technology reassessment is already stabilizing as an important element in the total periodic management of health technology.
Considering the systematic review result and the domestic health care environment, the four stages of the domestic health technology reassessment model, namely, "identification", "prioritization", "reassessment", and "decision", were finally developed. Also through the RAND Method (RAND/ UCLA appropriateness method), this study provided seven "identification" criteria, seven "prioritization" criteria and weighted values, and four "reassessment" criteria to enable the practical reassessment execution.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
Year Published:
2014
URL for published report:
http://www.neca.re.kr/center/researcher/report_view.jsp?boardNo=GA&seq=133&q=626f6172644e6f3d4741
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
South Korea
MeSH Terms
- Methods
Contact
Organisation Name:
National Evidence-based healthcare Collaborating Agency
Contact Address:
National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), 3~5F Health and Welfare Social Administration B/D, 400 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Contact Name:
int@neca.re.kr
Contact Email:
int@neca.re.kr
Copyright:
National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.