Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) for adult and pediatric patients: a review of clinical evidence

CADTH
Record ID 32014000182
English
Authors' recommendations: No evidence was found reporting the clinical evidence of using chlorhexidine-impregnated or coated PICCs compared to non-chlorhexidine PICCs. One study found no difference in terms of frequency of occlusion in adult ICU patients who had a valved versus a non-valved PICC line. Use of normal saline was associated with a longer duration of patency compared with heparin in neonates. No difference was found in terms of patency, occlusion, pain, burning, and swelling in pediatric patients in those who received heparin compared to those who received normal saline.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2013
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Canada
MeSH Terms
  • Catheterization, Peripheral
Contact
Organisation Name: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Contact Address: 600-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8 Canada. Tel: +1 613 226 2553; Fax: +1 613 226 5392;
Contact Name: requests@cadth.ca
Contact Email: requests@cadth.ca
Copyright: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.