A systematic review of tension-free urethropexy for stress urinary incontinence: intravaginal slingplasty and the tension-free vaginal tape procedures
Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical
Record ID 32001000093
English
Authors' objectives:
To assess the safety and efficacy of tension-free urethropexy for treating stress urinary incontinence in women in comparison to the two gold standard procedures - the Burch colposuspension and the pubovaginal sling.
Authors' recommendations:
Low-level evidence suggested that tension-free urethropexy may have possible benefits with respect to post-operative voiding dysfunction, operating time, post-operative catheterization, resumption of voiding, and convalescence when compared to the traditional procedures. Short and medium term objective cure rates for stress incontinence were similar for the new and traditional procedures. There were no available contrasting data on long term objective cure rates.
Authors' methods:
Systematic review
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
http://www.surgeons.org/asernip-s/
Year Published:
2001
URL for published report:
n/a
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
Australia
MeSH Terms
- Female
- Suburethral Slings
- Surgical Mesh
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
Contact
Organisation Name:
Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical
Contact Address:
ASERNIP-S 24 King William Street, Kent Town SA 5067 Australia Tel: +61 8 8219 0900
Contact Name:
racs.asernip@surgeons.org
Contact Email:
racs.asernip@surgeons.org
Copyright:
<p>Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical</p>
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.