Screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus

Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, Muise M, Vandermeer B, Aktary WM, Pasichnyk D, Seida JC, Donovan L
Record ID 32012000912
English
Authors' objectives: 1. Identify properties of screening tests for GDM. 2. Evaluate benefits and harms of screening for GDM. 3. Assess the effects of different screening and diagnostic thresholds on outcomes for mothers and their offspring. 4. Determine the benefits and harms of treatment for a diagnosis of GDM.
Authors' recommendations: While evidence supports a positive association with increasing plasma glucose on a 75 g or 100 g oral glucose tolerance test and macrosomia and primary cesarean section, clear thresholds for increased risk were not found. The 50 g oral glucose challenge test has high NPV but variable PPV. Treatment of GDM results in less preeclampsia and macrosomia. Current evidence does not show that treatment of GDM has an effect on neonatal hypoglycemia or future poor metabolic outcomes. There is little evidence of short-term harm from treating GDM other than an increased demand for services. Research is needed on the long-term metabolic outcome for offspring as a result of GDM and its treatment, and the "real world" effects of GDM treatment on use of care.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2012
URL for additional information: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/tp/gdmexuptp.htm
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: United States
MeSH Terms
  • Diabetes, Gestational
  • Mass Screening
Contact
Organisation Name: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Contact Address: Center for Outcomes and Evidence Technology Assessment Program, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Tel: +1 301 427 1610; Fax: +1 301 427 1639;
Contact Name: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Contact Email: martin.erlichman@ahrq.hhs.gov
Copyright: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.